ShortRound
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,826
- Reaction score
- 87,189
I'm of the opinion none of it matters without a new QB1
Dak ain't it.
Dak ain't it.
Your point is absolutely correct.my point wasn't don't value the OL. my point is you don't spend a top 12 pick on a guard. right now we have 3 first round OL men on the team....that's 3 premium picks. two of which are guards.
now, they spent 23M on trey smith. who was a 6th round pick. so the question is not spending. the question is which draft pick capital are you going to use to find the players to build your team.
and you just proved my point for me. so I appreciate it....picks in 2nd round. not top 15......
and btw, larry Allen. the best guard ever was a 2nd round pick.
Yeah,I'm of the opinion none of it matters without a new QB1
Dak ain't it.
This ^^^^^Eric Williams 3rd round draft pick
Mark Tuinei. Undrafted
Nate Newton. Undrafted
Mark Stepnoski 3rd round pick
Larry Allen 2nd round pick
Kevin Googan 8th round pick
The differance is these guys were blocking for Troy Aikman and Emmitt Smith
I agree with you the FO has been the constant issue with this team for the past 30 years. Jimmy was able to compensate and brought some success but there was no cap there and we went after players in free agency. I agree especially with your last statement, that is why we had Lance and now have Mingo on our team.oh, I am 100% in agreement with you. but do you spend a premium pick on a guard, the least important position on the OL? a LT, heck yes. but guard? I don't think so. how many of the eagles OL men were drafted in the top 15? yet as you said, they have a great OL and Barkley did great. if you are bad at player evaluation and drafting, then you spend your high picks on non-premium positions because you are afraid to miss. we have three 1st round picks on the OL. THREE!!!!! and two of them are guards!!!!
so how many of the past 10 superbowl teams have three 1st round OL men on their team. no, lets make that the past 15!
and the problem you speak of is, we are not very good in talent evaluation and managing draft and player personnel on the TEAM.
There are very few QBs in history that can compensate for a weak O line. Either you have to be a runner or an accurate passer with quick decision making. I would say maybe Rodgers in his prime and Tom Brady could still find success behind a weak line, but most of them would crumble. At the end of the day, it is a team sport and you have to shore up both the trenches and skill positions. A QB alone cannot win in this day and age. Mahomes is better than Hurts, but Hurts had a better team around him.You’ve got to get your QB before you focus on anything else.
And by get your QB I mean one that is skilled and talented, not paid well.
Exactly,we can just agree to disagree. I take a 25-35 defensive player that would allow the defense to be better over all. than a guard, who can't have the same impact for us to score another 10+ points a game we need because the defense sucks. I mean this defense really sucks.
SJ did mention there was trade offer on the table from Texans, but points value didn't add up. I would have still taken it.
So try to give Dak a line like he had his first 6ish years and expect different results?There are very few QBs in history that can compensate for a weak O line. Either you have to be a runner or an accurate passer with quick decision making. I would say maybe Rodgers in his prime and Tom Brady could still find success behind a weak line, but most of them would crumble. At the end of the day, it is a team sport and you have to shore up both the trenches and skill positions. A QB alone cannot win in this day and age. Mahomes is better than Hurts, but Hurts had a better team around him.