KingintheNorth
Chris in Arizona
- Messages
- 18,439
- Reaction score
- 25,819
"Everyone has a plan until they are punched in the nose" - Mike Tyson
Coaches need to win to keep their jobs.
Some don't even have to win to keep their job.
"Everyone has a plan until they are punched in the nose" - Mike Tyson
Coaches need to win to keep their jobs.
You're able to root for hardy?
Did I say anything about Hardy?
But while we are at it I don't see JG sitting him for any of these major transgressions.
RKG is a resume filler and sounds good during interviews.
Coachable guys are easy. It is what you get from the knuckleheads that separates the great ones. CMichael is a great example. He has a ton of talent but JG didn't like his attitude and buried him and then cut him and we are still scraping Practice Squads for RBs.
You're able to root for hardy?
I just remember a time when the idea we'd take a guy like Tyran Mathieu or leveon bell was literally "off the board". Which ....fine. But we have obviously now starting dealing with Guys with worse flaws than some 20 year old collegiates who could've used some leadership and guidance. Young, cheap, quiet players who could've been the future of the team.
I just am frustrated with the flip on stance as I would've loved to root for some of the aforementioned players.
If this is seen as too negative don't lock it I like Garrett now and I feel I was kinda wrong about him. There's something to be said for his stable approach as I see it as a franchise building tool with a consistent message that doesn't waiver.
This thread is all over the place I've had a lot of coffee im shaking.
Coaches should minimize speaking about their coaching ideology publicly. Doing so would prevent even the most transparently obvious terms from being misconstrued.
There is not a single coach in the NFL that doesn't want the "right kind of guy". It's just flowery coach speak that doesn't mean anything.
Right and wrong is relative when there are people continuingly obsessing (correct term) over terminology Garrett stated publicly...i think The earlier guy with the Tyson quote was right and you're wrong bc an opportunistic player wouldn't squander a year of his youth just to perform a beating on a female. This was like romos last or second to last season at an elite level I think they just closed their eyes and did the deal
Right and wrong is relative when there are people continuingly obsessing (correct term) over terminology Garrett stated publicly...
Wait. Just HOW long ago did this particular term begin disturbing personal sensibilities without end anyway?
She must be a right kind of girl.I have a girlfriend, but thanks anyway
I just remember a time when the idea we'd take a guy like Tyran Mathieu or leveon bell was literally "off the board". Which ....fine. But we have obviously now starting dealing with Guys with worse flaws than some 20 year old collegiates who could've used some leadership and guidance. Young, cheap, quiet players who could've been the future of the team.
I just am frustrated with the flip on stance as I would've loved to root for some of the aforementioned players.
If this is seen as too negative don't lock it I like Garrett now and I feel I was kinda wrong about him. There's something to be said for his stable approach as I see it as a franchise building tool with a consistent message that doesn't waiver.
This thread is all over the place I've had a lot of coffee im shaking.
That's Garretts motto not the joneses . It was obvious Garrett was pissed at drafting randy Gregory . While Stephan jones was like a kid on Christmas (from the videos I've seen inside the war room )
And yes, RKG is more about love of the game, work ethic, and heart. Not necessarily trying to win a game.
I just remember a time when the idea we'd take a guy like Tyran Mathieu or leveon bell was literally "off the board". Which ....fine. But we have obviously now starting dealing with Guys with worse flaws than some 20 year old collegiates who could've used some leadership and guidance. Young, cheap, quiet players who could've been the future of the team.
I just am frustrated with the flip on stance as I would've loved to root for some of the aforementioned players.
If this is seen as too negative don't lock it I like Garrett now and I feel I was kinda wrong about him. There's something to be said for his stable approach as I see it as a franchise building tool with a consistent message that doesn't waiver.
This thread is all over the place I've had a lot of coffee im shaking.
I just remember a time when the idea we'd take a guy like Tyran Mathieu or leveon bell was literally "off the board". Which ....fine. But we have obviously now starting dealing with Guys with worse flaws than some 20 year old collegiates who could've used some leadership and guidance. Young, cheap, quiet players who could've been the future of the team.
I just am frustrated with the flip on stance as I would've loved to root for some of the aforementioned players.
If this is seen as too negative don't lock it I like Garrett now and I feel I was kinda wrong about him. There's something to be said for his stable approach as I see it as a franchise building tool with a consistent message that doesn't waiver.
This thread is all over the place I've had a lot of coffee im shaking.
Someone asked Jim Boeheim from Syracuse how he taught rebounding to his guys and he said "we recruit guys that are 6'10", 6'11" and 7' and tell them to go get the ball."
It is easy to teach a bunch of RKGs and that is why JG said he likes them. It is like saying you prefer to draft All-Americans, no duh.