T.O.s departure means more work for the RBs

TheBeast

Benched
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Avenging Hayseed;2681193 said:
..............Thats all fine and good. But if the person doesnt know what they are talking about all you end up with is a "pretty" essay with zero substance. Myself, im alot more about content then I am about grammar or structure. :rolleyes: BTW.....That line of thinking is what led this country down the woeful path we are on. Everything LOOKED just peachy on PAPER, but in the end none of these Wallstreet rocket scientists knew what the H they were actually talking about. SUBSTANCE over structure........:eek:

The substance means nothing if it's a pain in the *** to read.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,337
Reaction score
64,040
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
JerryAdvocate;2681248 said:
Roy and Witten is a pretty good duo

and then you have Crayton in the slot

hopefully Austin stretching Ds out wide

and it's not all bad
Of course, it's not all bad. It's not "bad" at all. For some unknown reason, naysayers wish to imply that we have a receiving core equivalent to that of Billy Davis, Ernie Mills, Patrick Jeffers and David LaFleur. Insanity, in my opinion.
 

Avenging Hayseed

Interwebs fooseball expert
Messages
2,339
Reaction score
225
DallasEast;2681267 said:
Of course, it's not all bad. It's not "bad" at all. For some unknown reason, naysayers wish to imply that we have a receiving core equivalent to that of Billy Davis, Ernie Mills, Patrick Jeffers and David LaFleur. Insanity, in my opinion.
..............BINGO! Bigtime cosign. And thats a wrap folks, we can now put this one to bed.
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,696
Reaction score
18,043
irvin4evs;2680729 said:
Barber has done nothing to warrant more carries than Choice.

You are serious?
I mean, do you seriously believe that?
 

Ren

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,218
Reaction score
1,944
GimmeTheBall!;2680602 said:
I don't think RW, new in the offense, will get that much respect to get double coverage.

When healthy Roy can beat man to man single coverage. He's big, has good hands and uses his body, he need to improve his route running though those square inn's Garrett likes to call can be a disaster if he doesn't run crisp routes
 

hutru01

New Member
Messages
266
Reaction score
0
TO was our achilles heel. This Cowboys team will be better without the antics of a 5 year old. Roy Williams will be more in sync next year as he should learn the offense in the offseason.

TO was a distraction as he has been on every single team he has played on. There is a reason he has no Superbowl ring and never will. (NOT A TEAM PLAYER)
 

EPL0c0

The Funcooker
Messages
8,063
Reaction score
3,819
GimmeTheBall!;2680373 said:
It's a fzct. Teams, if they are smart, will man to man RW and Crayton and lay a safety and a LB on Witten.

And the rest will key on our RBs.

When teams see our suddenly mediocre receiving corps, you can count on our O line and RB having to do a lot more work. So much for offensive diversity.
Happened in NYG after Burress was booted. The difference was that their gameplan all year had focused more heavily on running the ball. I hope Garrett leans on the RBs/Oline to power this offense.
 
Top