T0 cant get a good release from a jam?

I LOVE ME SOME ME!;2619119 said:
So no examples? Just Jimmy Johnson saying the over the hill guy requires double coverage? hmmmmmm. Either cowboy fans dont know much or nfl defenses are dumb. I think i know the answer

Dude you just got totally owned and destroyed on this post.

You are so owned that you actually tried to change your argument.
You asked for proof other than the opinion of a respected cowboyszone poster and you were given articles or interviews from 2 well respected football analyst where they said TO can be jammed or pressed and he cant beat the pressure and yet you still want to argue.

I will say that i have seen many post on this message board and this is probably the number 1 thread where someone was made to look like a fool.
And sorry to tell you that you are the fool.

I guess you would want us all to think that your opinion of TO carries more weight than Jimmy Johnson's?

Get Real and admit defeat. Not admitting it doesnt make you look right.
 
I LOVE ME SOME ME!;2619119 said:
So no examples? Just Jimmy Johnson saying the over the hill guy requires double coverage? hmmmmmm. Either cowboy fans dont know much or nfl defenses are dumb. I think i know the answer


Simply use the search function on this site. I am not going to sit here and rehash this for the 1000th time. I am sure someone else will.

So if your so much smarter than us, simply use the search function, you will get all the answers you need.
 
Review of the first Commanders game were Springs manhandled Owens would be a start. There is plenty of these for review.
 
The people who constantly refer to the "jam" have no concept of how football works.

It's practically irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. It's a technique used to disrupt timing, but the Dallas offense doesn't have much timing to begin with.

I wonder what percentage of people who talk about "Terrell Owens" and "jams" actually watch him at the line of scrimmage. I'm guessing it's close to 0.

Posters like DallasYeastinfection don't watch X's and O's, they just regurgitate pretentious sports media blurbs.
 
superonyx;2619141 said:
Dude you just got totally owned and destroyed on this post.

You are so owned that you actually tried to change your argument.
You asked for proof other than the opinion of a respected cowboyszone poster and you were given articles or interviews from 2 well respected football analyst where they said TO can be jammed or pressed and he cant beat the pressure and yet you still want to argue.

I will say that i have seen many post on this message board and this is probably the number 1 thread where someone was made to look like a fool.
And sorry to tell you that you are the fool.

I guess you would want us all to think that your opinion of TO carries more weight than Jimmy Johnson's?

Get Real and admit defeat. Not admitting it doesnt make you look right.

Every wr can be beat with safety help. read my second post and jimmys comments. Its not about admitting defeat. Its dumb that people point out TO cant beat a jam with success without adding you need safety help. Ive been saying it the whole thread
 
DuaneThomas71;2619206 said:
The people who constantly refer to the "jam" have no concept of how football works.

It's practically irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. It's a technique used to disrupt timing, but the Dallas offense doesn't have much timing to begin with.

I wonder what percentage of people who talk about "Terrell Owens" and "jams" actually watch him at the line of scrimmage. I'm guessing it's close to 0.

Posters like DallasYeastinfection don't watch X's and O's, they just regurgitate pretentious sports media blurbs.
I luv you too, iJordanTaber. ;) :)
 
our main problem is that jamming the receiver might slow down the route a tick or two, by that time tony would be running for his life. :bang2:
 
jamming TO slows him down getting into his routes

he's been most successful in his career getting a clean release, getting the ball early, and making something happen after the catch due to his speed, once he gets going, he's hard to stop, but if he has to stop, catch, and start again, it's pretty easy to bring him down, cuz most times he'll take a dive
 
I wonder why someone who "can't start and stop" is so lethal on double moves.

:rolleyes:

The strength of Terrell Owens is burning teams deep. He hasn't done much running after the catch in Dallas.
 
iRoot4Losers;2619288 said:
jamming TO slows him down getting into his routes

he's been most successful in his career getting a clean release, getting the ball early, and making something happen after the catch due to his speed, once he gets going, he's hard to stop, but if he has to stop, catch, and start again, it's pretty easy to bring him down, cuz most times he'll take a dive

While we may disagree on some points, teams have always known this... They didn't just realize it... Which gets us to Jason Garrett...
 
DuaneThomas71;2619294 said:
I wonder why someone who "can't start and stop" is so lethal on double moves.

:rolleyes:

The strength of Terrell Owens is burning teams deep. He hasn't done much running after the catch in Dallas.

Because of the vertical nature of the passing game in Dallas... Which shows he is great WR, in that he produced in a system that isn't suited to his natural abilities...
 
khiladi;2619296 said:
While we may disagree on some points, teams have always known this... They didn't just realize it... Which gets us to Jason Garrett...

that's true
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,203
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top