kskboys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 46,923
- Reaction score
- 49,686
Pretty much to a T what I was going to say!!!So when do we ever get serious about defense? Until we do, losing our left tackle in a Super Bowl is a problem that will never happen.
Pretty much to a T what I was going to say!!!So when do we ever get serious about defense? Until we do, losing our left tackle in a Super Bowl is a problem that will never happen.
Or simply take some big nasty OL's in the mid rounds. If we'd have been doing this all along, we wouldn't have had to spend so many 1sts on the OL.It absolutely does not help to fix the offensive line if our defense is in shambles. I mean, we've had one of the best in the business and where has that got us?
I'd rather see us take a chance on the line holding up and fix the defense. There's a better chance of the line being good enough than the defense being good enough without a major retooling. If the line does fall apart, then we can begin reloading it next year. If it does hold up and we fix the defense, then we have a chance to compete.
What I cannot comprehend is how this isn't blatantly obvious to everyone.Anybody wanting to go offense with a OT or TE (good grief) don't say one word about how the defense can't stop anybody. Look, the biggest issue on the team is Defense, all of it...no amount of OL or signing of Dak is going to change this team's fortune more than fixing the defense.
Or simply take some big nasty OL's in the mid rounds. If we'd have been doing this all along, we wouldn't have had to spend so many 1sts on the OL.
One thing to keep in mind with the mid round OL picks is that all of those guys except for Biadasz were taken with Jason Garrett at the helm. I’m not just beating up on Garrett here but one thing you can say about his time as the Dallas HC is that his offense never dealt well with OL injuries. We all remember the Chaz Green debacle in Atlanta as the coaches seemed helpless to do anything to assist the struggling LT in that game.We've taken a lot of OL's in the mid rounds over the years, but it's hit and miss. Before Doug Free, it was mostly miss.
Since 2010, we've drafted Sam Young (6th), David Arkin (4th), Bill Nagy (7th), Chaz Green (3rd), Laurence Gibson (7th), Connor McGovern (3rd) and Tyler Biadasz (4th). I can't say I know for sure we got any of those right to the point where we don't need to spend first- or second-rounders on the OL. That's why we spent three firsts and a second on starters in that same time period.
I'm not saying we shouldn't try for players like McGovern and Biadasz to fill those starting roles, but the reality with any position is that most of the time it's going to be the first- and second-rounders who stick.
That might sound like I'm advocating drafting OL early, but I'm not. This year, I'm advocating using those early picks on defense and not truly worrying about the OL until next year. Yes, we can pick OL in the mid-round, but our expectations shouldn't be too high with those picks.
It's also one of the reasons I want go defense-heavy in the draft and not worry about the line. The hit percentages are not high and go down as the draft progresses, so there's a better chance of us getting what we need if saturate that side of the ball.
The offense is our strength even if we don't add anyone on that side of the ball. Our defense is terrible and needs all the help it can get.
For those that say we should ignore OL and try to develop a guy late, I suggest you take a look at the hit rate of tackles taken outside of the first two rounds.
https://www.___GET_REAL_URL___/s/ww...cos-should-draft-an-offensive-tackle-revealed
In the last decade of draft classes, 69% of the future starters came from Round 1 and 2. Seven out of every eight 3rd and 4th rounders failed, so it isn't fair to say "the whole league" is developing these starting OTs on the cheap. Heck, from 2015-19, the league only found 2 starting tackles from rounds 3-7 on 68 picks (Orlando Brown and Sam Tevi), which is an unthinkable 97% miss rate.
It absolutely does not help to fix the offensive line if our defense is in shambles. I mean, we've had one of the best in the business and where has that got us?
I'd rather see us take a chance on the line holding up and fix the defense. There's a better chance of the line being good enough than the defense being good enough without a major retooling. If the line does fall apart, then we can begin reloading it next year. If it does hold up and we fix the defense, then we have a chance to compete.
Tyron has a chronic back that forces him to miss games every season, the neck injury was associated to that back. Nobody would be shocked if Tyron wanted to retire.You can’t equate one player to another. That’s just ridiculous and naive. I remember when Lee was drafted I knew he wouldn’t last long just like Dat Nguen. Just too small to play the position. Tyron is a beast of a man. He’s not injury prone but had a neck issue that is apparently fixed. He’s a bargain and under contract. Martin is in the prime of his career. La’el is just getting started. Biadasz showed he should’ve been the starter since day 1. Nothing wrong with picking a good prospect in the first few rounds but rebuild the entire OL? Naw.
Left Tackle is one position, that is extremely hard to find a quality option later on in a draft. They usually get scooped up right away. In a deep Tackle class, this is the year to be able to land one outside of the 1st rd.Wow.
The strength became a problem again before we were able to build the perfect roster everywhere else?
Amazing how that goes.
At some point there can't be premium picks spent everywhere. Coaching has to overcome those weaknesses.
Too many teams are getting away with much less on the OL.
First, I agree with you on Tyron Smith, but I don't think it is as bad as Sean Lee. However, as George Young once said, it is better to let a player go a year to early than a year too late. I advocated finding a replacement for Smith last offseason. I still think they need to have a backup plan for Smith but what we learned last year is a capable backup might be good enough if Smith is the only player on the line to go down with an injury. IMO, if they resign Erving to be the backup, they will probably have enough to cover for him when he has to miss games. If they lose 3 guys again, that's too much for any team to deal with.
If not for the historically bad defense last year, I would be fine using the first pick in the draft for a LT. But defense has to be the priority. I think DE is probably the only position that is not an immediate need on defense. If you are worried about Tyron Smith, then how about LVE? Smith is dealing with age and years of pounding. What is LVE's excuse? If Lewis and Awuzie are not resigned, and my guess is they are not, then the Cowboys are short on CBs too. And we already know the problems at DT and S.
When you consider the Cowboys health problems on the OL, the potential loss of 3 CBs in 2 years, LVE's injury issues, Dak not being signed, still no solutions at DT and S after years, Zeke apparently slowing down while getting paid more than ever, this team is an absolute mess. There are lots of problems that are not going to get solved in 1 year so they need to prioritize. LT is on the list but not at the top of the list, IMO.
Here's the deal:
Smith and Collins MAY be able to come back and be as good as the last couple of years, or at least close to it. Cowboys know more about what was done in surgery and how the players are progressing. "Surgery" covers a broad spectrum of procedures, getting a wisdom tooth pulled is surgery and so is a heart transplant, but there's a huge difference in recovery time and potential. Surgery for Collins could have been just removing some bone spurs, which isn't hard to recover from. IF they recover well we're good to go this coming season.
But the defense was awful, there are lots of free agents on the defense. Defense is in a world of trouble.
Defense needs more attention at this time....
OT’s are difficult to find, for sure. Centers and guards would probably be a different story, though I haven’t looked it up to make sure. There are more than a few starting IOL in the NFL that weren’t first round picks.
However, having said that, the Cowboys got somewhat adequate play out of Knight and Steel at tackle, considering the draft capital used on them... which was zero draft picks. I feel rather confident that a 3rd or fourth round pick could be used to take a tackle that is much more talented than either of those two guys.
To be clear, I’m not saying to find your long term left tackle replacement in the 3rd or 4th round. I’m saying to find a good swing tackle there who can play better than Steele so that if Smith does go down, the team can get by with him better than with Steele.
Philbin’s system has long done more with less talented guys.
My point is that I don’t think that Smith is done or about to be done. He had the surgery which I feel will alleviate that issue after trying to make it without surgery. He’s just 30 and should have a few good years left. Could I be wrong? Of course, but I don’t think I am. A better swing tackle than the two UDFA tackles from last year can be found in the mid rounds, IMO and provide some security for any injury in case I am. Then a long term solution can be found next offseason.
I really do think that without widespread injuries along the OL, a decent swing tackle would provide plenty if that’s the only real problem along the line.
I would be ok with Slater because he could play at OG until time to move out to tackle, and I might even be lobbying for that move if the defense didn’t need so much help. But unless there just isn’t a good defender there, I’d rather wait to find Smith’s replacement.
Our defense isn't 1 top 100 pick away from being rebuilt. Our offense is still going to have to carry this team, if they cannot hold up up front, they have zero chance for success.
Last year Dallas had more offensive line injuries than I’ve ever seen the team have - by far - and they got by on good offensive scheming and very good coaching of that unit.
Philbin worked miracles after losing La’el Collins, Tyron Smith, and Travis Frederick (retirement) for what was essentially the entire season. Then, during the season he lost swing tackle Erving, center Looney, RG Martin, and rookie center Biadasz for chunks of the season.
Even with that apocalyptic scenario unfolding (and losing their starting and backup QB), it wasn’t the offense that caused the team to lose many of their games. It was an abysmal defense that failed in nearly every regard until close to the end of the season.
Getting Quinn in place of Nolan will change a whole lot and improve things greatly, but defense needs a lot of help.
So, unless there are widespread, debilitating injuries along the OL, I’m pretty sure that side of the ball will be ok as long as Dak is back. Even if Smith does go down, this coaching staff has proven that they’ll be ok with the swing tackle stepping in and playing with Williams-Biadasz-Martin-Collins, or whatever starting lineup they settle on.
This is no longer Garrett’s OL where one guy going down kills them. This staff has proven they can deal with OL injuries in an effective and intelligent manner.
While I am all for taking the BPA... and if Slater is by far the BPA then take him... I don’t think they are in a situation where they should have to fill a LT position early for fear of Smith getting hurt during the season. They’ve proven they can handle one injury on the OL.
Besides, I do think that the surgery he finally got will effectively fix that problem going forward. But if it doesn’t, I think they’ll still be OK as long as they get a decent swing tackle.
I did read it, just going through the responds. We saw what happens when a team loses their Tackles late in a season, even the Chiefs couldn't survive. Is it coincidence that we haven't seen the playoffs since our OL has regressed?I've said the same thing many times the last few weeks, certainly that's a correct statement. No disagreement there.
Did you read my post? I said "Smith and Collins MAY be able to come back and be as good as the last couple of years, or at least close to it...IF they recover well ."
A pretty good Smith and Collins, with Biadasz, etc. can "hold up up front" Cowboys know how they are recovering and what can be expected of them, I'm just noting that if that's the case then the team can load up on defensive draft picks, which will help the defense....
For those that say we should ignore OL and try to develop a guy late, I suggest you take a look at the hit rate of tackles taken outside of the first two rounds.
https://www.___GET_REAL_URL___/s/ww...cos-should-draft-an-offensive-tackle-revealed
In the last decade of draft classes, 69% of the future starters came from Round 1 and 2. Seven out of every eight 3rd and 4th rounders failed, so it isn't fair to say "the whole league" is developing these starting OTs on the cheap. Heck, from 2015-19, the league only found 2 starting tackles from rounds 3-7 on 68 picks (Orlando Brown and Sam Tevi), which is an unthinkable 97% miss rate.
I did read it, just going through the responds. We saw what happens when a team loses their Tackles late in a season, even the Chiefs couldn't survive. Is it coincidence that we haven't seen the playoffs since our OL has regressed?
Thats fair, and I realize they may go OT at 10, but I don't consider it ideal.Left Tackle is one position, that is extremely hard to find a quality option later on in a draft. They usually get scooped up right away. In a deep Tackle class, this is the year to be able to land one outside of the 1st rd.