Team positioned to be aggressive next year

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,310
Reaction score
19,713
I know it's not popular....but I want them to bring in Suh. We can easily do it. And with Suh saying his agent will choose a destination...well...we are in play.

I wouldn't mind them bringing in Suh. Under the right leadership and coach he has done his job. the previous regime at detroit was awful. when the coach attacks another coach after the game, what do you expect the players to do. there is too many RKG in dallas for him to get out of line. put suh, Crawford on the line and now you got something special
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
Kyle Wilber was drafted to play in the 3-4 and lacks a natural position in the 4-3.

He's also has the worst special teams rating (-6.1) on the entire team this season. Cam Lawrence is the next lowest (-4.0) but playing specials is why he's on the roster.

Honestly, I'd like to churn both of them next year.

I'm sorry but I have a hard time taking pff special teams rating seriously. You just cannot see it on the broadcast.
 

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,483
Reaction score
10,762
Don't want him, and he's a giant risk to underperform his contract in my book, but he's definitely the kind of impact player you'd be looking at if you wanted to make a splash.



This is something we agree on, Idgit... Not a fan of Suh becoming a Cowboy.... unfortunately, it's just the type of "splash" move Jerry loves to make.
 

MichaelWinicki

"You want some?"
Staff member
Messages
47,997
Reaction score
27,917
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
This is something we agree on, Idgit... Not a fan of Suh becoming a Cowboy.... unfortunately, it's just the type of "splash" move Jerry loves to make.

Jerry has been somewhat "controlled" in his bad habits.

I don't think Suh will end up in Dallas.
 

jubal

Active Member
Messages
690
Reaction score
53
I agree with dline man with first 2 picks and find 1solid free agent for def.

Maybe they get some bargain free agent for depth as well but would like to see 1 solid vet free agent.[/quo
I'd rather draft d line or corner w our first few picks. I don't want to sign any other free agents. It has proven to not work and rather build team through draft. If jpp or Suh is available there is a reason why. I don't want anymore cast offs

Hear,Hear!! Preach it brother.
Best post i've read on this subject.
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
If anything this year has proven that this team can definitely contend next year, especially if it improves the defense.

Assuming that the Salary Cap next year is 140 million, we would only have 1.7 million in cap space, clearly not enough to sign anyone.

That doesn't mean the team can't become aggressive in improving the team.

Here are some steps that I will highlight.

#1 Romo restructure or pay cut, saves as much as 12.8 million against the cap in 2015
#2 Smith restructure, saves about 8.2 million against the cap in 2015
#3 Carr pay cut or june 1st cut saves 8 million (june 1st cut) against the cap in 2015.
#4 Melton cut saves 8.5 million against the cap in 2015.
#5 Witten restructure saves 3 million against the cap in 2015.
#6 Dekoda Watson cut saves 1.5 million against the cap in 2015.
#7 Terrell McClain cut saves 900k against the cap in 2015
(#8 I simulated cutting Doug Free which saves 7 million, but I think slightly less savings could be had by reworking his contract). I'm not sure what measures we have for reducing a club option, but if we have to cut him to re-sign him, then I'm not sure if we will do that given the dead money involved in cutting him, and future potential dead money.

These moves would bring us 51 million dollars under the cap in 2015 (again assuming that the cap was 140 million).

51 million could definitely allow us to re-sign Dez and McClain and give us latitude to see what we want to do with Murray or Peterson. I would also allow us to reinvest in the defense.

I would suggest we could still be prudent shoppers though and get guys like Charles Tillman on low end deals. Those combined with a nice defensive draft (save for a WR and maybe a RT).

These aggressive moves would have to show a lot of faith in Romo and Crawford especially. Cutting Melton may turn out to be a mistake, but at this point I think going with Crawford and Okoye may be the more prudent measure and focusing resources elsewhere and getting the best 11 out there.

I think getting McClain and Hitchens this year puts us in a very strong position next year. Once we re-sign McClain, we're probably set at linebacker, especially if we bring Durant back, which shouldn't prove difficult.

We can bring Tillman in as a stopgap to replace Carr, and we can draft a rookie cornerback that fits the system, rather than necessarily drafting one high.

We can focus the draft on getting another pass rusher, but with the money in free agency we can get the best options available there as well. The problem here is that there aren't that many options out there in free agency scheduled for 2015, so unless someone gets cut, I'm not sure what we're going to do here. I definitely don't want Greg Hardy.

I infamously made a topic about blowing the defense up, but I think some of the moves made in this offseason can belay that a bit. Replace Carr, upgrade the defensive line, get Sean Lee back and move him to the less injury susceptible weak side, and this could be a really good defense next year, at the very least good enough to be a super bowl contender.

I think we'll also have the ability to get that speed WR for Romo, though the front office might be reluctant to give up on Williams, which the move would clearly suggest.

51mil in cap space? No.
First Dallas cant cut Free because his last 2 years are voided. But Dallas will bring him back in a 4 or 5 yr deal. Free is only 30 yrs old people.
I think if Romos back is fine in the offseason they will restructure him, Jerry has said he wants Romo to QB the Cowboys for 5 more yrs. But if he isnt right i see them just biting the bullet and getting the big chunk of money out of the way.
Tyron is a given that he will get restructured.
Carr will be designated june cut
And Meltons option just wont be picked up.
Witten just let him play out his deal, you dont need to be adding years of money to that old body.
Terrell McClain is a solid rotational guy who can play both inside spots and isnt expensive.
Dekota who?

Im going to say the cap will be 145mil
Dallas right now would be 6.787mil under the cap

I say Romo plays on current deal
Tyron Restructure to 15.022mil under the cap
Melton option not picked up 23.523 mil under
Free voided contract 30.563mil under the cap
Dekota Watson cut 31.813 mil under
Weeden cut 32.683mil under

32.683 mil under the cap is plenty to work with to sign Dez, McClain, Durant, and Free and add some FAs to this defense. a bigtime DE i would hope
JJP or Hughes

Maybe a FS
Love Rahim Moore

Think Jerry will flirt with AP if he can get a FA class where he gets a big time DE and a backend FS. People dont realise how bad Jerry wants a superbowl.

Then theres still Romo restructure if they need it. and Carr's money for the rookies.
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,257
Reaction score
18,648
2015 is the last year where the team planned to restructure Tony Romo's contract.

Romo had a fully guaranteed $13.5M base salary this season and $15M of his $17M base salary will be fully guaranteed next year.

His 2016 base salary is only $8.5M, which is the lowest of any of the new years in his new contract and a 50% drop from 2015.

Dallas planned on restructuring Romo in 2014 and '15 and then leaving his contract alone after that.

I don't think so.

Once you restructure, and start moving more money back, you don't tend to stop doing it. At least this front office doesn't approach it that way. To me, especially in light of Romo's health situation on a long term basis, I take my lumps now, and do not restructure his deal any further.

To me, planned restructures = bad cap management.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
2015 is the last year where the team planned to restructure Tony Romo's contract.

Romo had a fully guaranteed $13.5M base salary this season and $15M of his $17M base salary will be fully guaranteed next year.

His 2016 base salary is only $8.5M, which is the lowest of any of the new years in his new contract and a 50% drop from 2015.

Dallas planned on restructuring Romo in 2014 and '15 and then leaving his contract alone after that.

Yep and there is no reason to get too upset about it. There will be a day when we are paying a rookie or a FA to play and we won't have that particular problem. But we should try and limit borrowing against next weeks payday.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
If they do, then they are inviting the same dead money problems that have plagued them the past two off seasons. If there was a contract on the team that I would leave alone, it's Tony Romo's.

Restructuring Romo's contract buys the team time to build this team while not mortgaging the potential to win a super bowl with him.

When it comes time to replace Romo, his lack of base salary will free this time up pretty quickly. Your response is ideological rather than a practical examination of what the numbers look like.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
Post is pretty misleading. #1 and #2 are pretty much automatic restructures. So suggesting that we only have 1.5 mil or so of cap space is just going to bring out the chicken littles. Similarly, Melton hasn't earned his big money deal so we won't be picking up that option. Also, Doug Free's final years are not real. Those are fake option years tacked on to spread out cap hit from a restructure. Both Free and the team see him as a UFA at the end of the year.

So the solutions you are posting here ... these aren't some sort of shrewd observations. This is the work of a front office that knows what they are doing.

You read way into that. Even saying 1.5 million is purely based on a speculative 2015 salary cap. And 1 and 2 are pretty automatic, but they're automatic because of where this team is. If Romo had his worst year, the team might have looked to cut ties with him. Romo having his best year results in the front office trusting him by taking on his contract for the remainder of his career and building around him.

No where did I say these were secrets that I uncovered. I said the team was positioned to do this in the title... Leave your agenda at the door.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
this was true last off-season as well, the GM's tepid approach makes me think he had written this year off. maybe a whiff of success will change his approach next off-season...

This year was very much a transitional year. They didn't really have the flexibility to do much this year. Next year they have a lot more flexibility, something gained by walking away from Ratliff, Ware, and Austin. 2016 will have even more flexibility with us walking away from Carr.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
I'm all for avoiding unnecessary contract restructures in order to extend your super stars once their rookie contracts are up, cut Melton & B. Carr(June 1st) this offseason, continue to draft well, & only sign mid-level FA's that our scouting department does their due diligence on. The Mincey, Hayden, McClain, Moore, Selvie(worked last year) signings worked out well & demonstrate the blueprint of how we should approach free agency in today's NFL in order to establish quality NFL depth on the cheap. Notice how the B. Carr, H. Melton, Kyle Orton signings didn't work out that well for us. You can even look back in history & see our high priced free agent signings/ trades usually didn't work out that well for us: Leonard Davis, Marco Rivera, Anthony Henry, Roy Williams, Mike Vanderjat. We have to be smart in FA & how we spend our cap dollars.

The Melton signing hasn't worked out for us? Are you serious?

The Brandon Carr signing was a mistake, because he was never a #1 CB. He was a #2 and we paid him top dollar expecting him to do something he hadn't. And then we moved to a system that doesn't play to his strengths.

Leonard Davis signing worked out EXTREMELY well. As did signing T.O. and La'Roi Glover.

Marco Rivera got hurt, which happens to players, but the club was suspect in signing him instead of the other guard from Green Bay who was younger and better who went for basically the same money.

Roy Williams was a questionable trade when we could have got Anquan Boldin for a lot less.

You're confusing correlation with causation, a common yet aggravating mistake.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
Revis got 12M for this season, with 10M of it as a bonus.

I would be OK giving him 12M for 1 year.

Revis wants to be in New England... also he does not fit our scheme. It's not just about throwing money at the problem, it's about getting the best players who actually fit with what we are trying to do here.
 

romothesavior

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,512
Reaction score
4,366
The "don't restructure Romo" argument is a bad one for three reasons:

(1) You're kicking interest-free money into a cap that will continue to inflate. The credit card analogy is really bad.

(2) Our next starting QB will almost certainly be a rookie contract from the draft. Yes, paying dead money to a guy no longer on the squad isn't fun, but we will easily make up the difference.

(And most importantly, to me at least)
(3) We have a real chance to contend the next year or two. If kicking the can get get us a Super Bowl, we do it without hesitation. I want Tony, Witten and Co. to win one more than anything. Now is the time to be aggressive. Yes, bear in mind long-term cap issues, but don't let them scare you into being conservative.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
You have to wonder if they would have released Ware knowing where they are right now.

Releasing Ware was still the right decision. How many times have we told ourselves that releasing a player a year early is better than a year late? How many years of decline have we seen from Ware. He is playing better in a better situation in Denver, but I don't expect that to last. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I would still cut Ware as he refused to take a pay cut last year.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
The "don't restructure Romo" argument is a bad one for three reasons:

(1) You're kicking interest-free money into a cap that will continue to inflate. The credit card analogy is really bad.

(2) Our next starting QB will almost certainly be a rookie contract from the draft. Yes, paying dead money to a guy no longer on the squad isn't fun, but we will easily make up the difference.

(And most importantly, to me at least)
(3) We have a real chance to contend the next year or two. If kicking the can get get us a Super Bowl, we do it without hesitation. I want Tony, Witten and Co. to win one more than anything. Now is the time to be aggressive. Yes, bear in mind long-term cap issues, but don't let them scare you into being conservative.

I was just going to write all these things.

I also mentioned Romo taking a pay cut to which many people said that was ridiculous. That is because they think a pay cut is necessarily pejorative. That is not the case. The reality is that Romo taking a pay cut can go a long way towards helping this team win a championship, and it can go a long way towards shifting the narrative on his career. If Romo takes a pay cut and as a result or correlation the Cowboys win the super bowl, Romo will go down in history as one of the best QBs in the NFL. Something on the backend will garner him a lot more money, whether he decides to go into coaching or broadcasting. Romo strikes me as the type that would potentially do this. Maybe he won't, but I certainly don't think it is ridiculous.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
Definitely.

I hope the team is open to signing a DE on either side and doesn't limit themselves by focusing on LDEs.

They gave up a lot to select DeMarcus Lawrence and I worry they might want to give the RDE job to him next year.

I believe Lawrence can play both sides and I have no qualms about moving him if a pure RDE is added during free agency.




Pro Football Focus has Brandon Carr leading all CBs this year with 15 missed tackles.

I expect Carr will be released, so I'd like to add a CB capable of starting in free agency and also try to add one during the draft.

Decent free agent corners may cost too much.




I'd like to add someone to play in deep coverage in the Nickel.



On top of what you mentioned, I don't expect Kyle Wilber to make the cut next year.

Better athleticism in the LB group is certainly needed. Re-signing Justin Durant shouldn't be expensive and hopefully a keeper or two is uncovered from the draft and undrafted ranks.

If a deep safety is added, Barry Church can play as a Nickel 'backer.




We probably go with who is on hand.

There's a lot of developmental interior DL, but maybe a nice value shows up in free agency or the draft.




Anthony Spencer is a fallback option for me, I hope something is done to upgrade the position during free agency with #93 and George Selvie being shown the door. If a RDE is added, I'll move Lawrence over to LDE. If it's a LDE like Jabaal Sheard, Law Dog can stay at RDE.

This would allow Jeremy Mincey to be a rotation guy on both sides, his high motor is perfectly suited to this role.

And I'd still like to draft the position even if it gets addressed with a free agent.

Great breakdown of another great breakdown.

I think the emphasis though needs to be on replacing the strong side. Replacing Spencer and Selvie is absolutely key. However, I do think the side some of these players play on can be interchangeable. I could see Mincey absolutely going to the strong side. You have to put some weight into Lawrence, but if we could get JPP and draft another edge rusher and have JPP, Lawrence, Mincey, and a rookie defensive end, I think we would be in pretty good shape there.

I think bringing in Charles Tillman would really help us out. He is a free agent, I don't think Chicago will resign him, he loves Marinelli and Marinelli loves him. So assuming Marinelli stays here next year, I think he is a no brainer. Also it wouldn't be a long term deal nor would it break the bank, and we would still be able to draft a guy. The secondary would thus look like this:

Tillman, Scandrick, Rookie, Moore, Claiborne, Patmon. Similarly, I think that would put us in pretty decent shape, with an improved pass rush.

We also need to focus on getting someone who fits a tampa 2 system. This doesn't mean we need to get the best man cover corner in the draft. Sherman was drafted in the 5th round.

When it comes to Kyle Wilber, I think he will be given the time now that he essentially isn't going back between positions. I think he has at least one more year left with us.

I agree, I don't see much happening at defensive tackle next year. We already have more tackles than we can play.
 
Top