Beast_from_East
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 30,140
- Reaction score
- 27,231
The same thing was said by the team and the fans about the Saints game, and after the Cowboys won easily, the Saints suddenly aren't very good. Even if the Cowboys beat the Seahawks, people will say the Seahawks are not as good as last year.
Personally, I don't care. I hope we play the worst team in the league every week if it means a win because all that matters is winning games. Teams are judged by what they do or don't do in the playoffs, but you have to get to the playoffs first and you do that by winning as many games as you can during the season. It doesn't matter how easy/hard the games are as long as you win enough of them. If the Cowboys lose to the Seahawks by 30 points or 1 point, it's all the same to me because it's a loss, which in the end, is all that counts or matters.
I just don't agree with the logic that losing by 1 point or losing by 30 points is the same thing. Yes, the L counts the same but it is all the intangibles that you cant quantify that come into play.
If you play the defending world champions in their home stadium and you lose by 1 single point...................your entire psyche is totally different going forward. Like I said, when the Giants lost by just a couple of points to the undefeated Patriots back in the day it showed them that they did belong on the same field as the Patriots and that confidence lead them through the playoffs and in their rematch in the SB with them.
If Dallas loses by 30 points tomorrow, they do not belong on the same field with the Seahawks and the team, coaches, fans, and even ownership will know it. So it does matter when it comes to the intangibles, which by the way is what is pointed to when it comes to Garrett. Folks say the intangibles like attention to detail, professionalism, culture change, being your best every day, ect....are all signs that he and his program are turning the team around even though the results have not been there.
So yes, if you want to go by just pure results of win vs. loses then losing by 30 points is the same as losing by 1 point and Garrett and Campo are equal in coaching ability since neither coach has ever seen the playoffs. But if you want to include the intangibles, then you can make a distinction, that is my point.