PA Cowboy Fan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,301
- Reaction score
- 51,193
Exactly. He was Mr. Tease.The difference is that Romo would have teased us with the possibility of winning only to throw the game sealing interception on our last drive.
Exactly. He was Mr. Tease.The difference is that Romo would have teased us with the possibility of winning only to throw the game sealing interception on our last drive.
Every one of my arguments are based on STATS and FACTS.Steve just admit your rag to riches story was taken from you and that would make you more credible ( not that you don’t have sone credibility)
Your arguments are based more on emotion .
You can argue now the veteran made more sense because the rookie failed but the vet failed too against essentially the same team in GB with a better squad in 14
You’re crusade to argue with anyone who disagrees with you is apparent
Just say Tony was one of my favorite cowboys ever and I had hoped he’d have a chance to complete his legacy with a sb run
Unfortunately his legacy says the same as Dak at the moment and only one qb can change it
He was the reason we had a chance at the last drive. But...you blame ONLY him?The difference is that Romo would have teased us with the possibility of winning only to throw the game sealing interception on our last drive.
Seventy-five of Romo's 248 career touchdown passes came in the fourth quarter. That's three more fourth-quarter touchdown passes than Staubach and Aikman had combined.Well Romo couldn't will his team to victory either so he and Dak have something in common.
Idiots...god...The difference is that Romo would have teased us with the possibility of winning only to throw the game sealing interception on our last drive.
Agree, wasn’t even close. The ping I disagree with is Dak was awful against the Giants and Vikings and he was known to practice horrible. They’re argument was basically the “it” factor, so there were telling signs that guy refused to heed. I think in large part it had to do with the cheaper contract and at that point in time the offense was centered around Zeke and the OL and they never really considered it Dak’s offense.The Cowboys did NOT start the superior QB in the second half of the 2016 season. They went with the "we're on a win season so don't screw it up" philosophy. Also it would be fair to argue that back in 2016, nobody knew what Dak's long-term potential was going to be. And as long as the Cowboys were winning, it was fair to roll with Dak and see what he could do.
Of course later on it was clearly evident that Dak can't hold a handle to Romo's throwing talent. But Romo of course retired, so it is a moot point.
Oh my. You appear to be passionate about this subject.Sounds good.
Romo was a much better QB than this stiff.
Close your eyes and imagine Romo being completely incompetent against the 49ers in back to back playoff performances, one of which his defense is balling out. You can't.
It takes more than LEADERSHIP and sky points. You have to have talent.
Romo willed crappy rosters to winning records and the playoffs several times.Well Romo couldn't will his team to victory either so he and Dak have something in common.
What a silly post.Steve just admit your rag to riches story was taken from you and that would make you more credible ( not that you don’t have sone credibility)
Your arguments are based more on emotion .
You can argue now the veteran made more sense because the rookie failed but the vet failed too against essentially the same team in GB with a better squad in 14
You’re crusade to argue with anyone who disagrees with you is apparent
Just say Tony was one of my favorite cowboys ever and I had hoped he’d have a chance to complete his legacy with a sb run
Unfortunately his legacy says the same as Dak at the moment and only one qb can change it
He dragged us to 8-8 -big deal.. And then he failed trying to get us in the playoffs. And don't tell me that he dragged us into the playoffs because those teams had talent. Romo had more offensive weapons than Dak does. I'll give you Dak has a better defense. And I've seen Dak play elite and I've seen him play like a scrub. Very inconsistent. Same as Romo. Do I think Romo's a better QB?..yes but it doesn't matter because he didn't do anything with that talent. Debating what Romo could do is useless because he had his chances and he failed big time.Romo willed crappy rosters to winning records and the playoffs several times.
Dak drags top level rosters down.
.
Big difference.
The Denver game was the perfect summary of Romo's entire career.Exactly. He was Mr. Tease.
The cowboy fanbase is ridiculed because they are spoiled and believe because they were so successful in past that it should be every seasonWhat a silly post.
Thus is why the Cowboys fan base is rightly the most ridiculed in all of pro sports.
you know you must have been off your meds again yesterday what a petulent child you can be when it comes to Romo. I tried to remove myself from this thread but alas you wouldnt have it so Ill respond to you and then Im done only because I do have soft side for your arrogance (we go back long way)Every one of my arguments are based on STATS and FACTS.
Maybe you should rethink YOUR "argument". Based on emotion. Rom o failed you
What stats have YOU...EVER..posted....that support your hate for him? Nothing. You never posted any stats ever.
You can't face that YOU..are the emotional one...not me. Sorry bud. True.
Shall I post once again the stats that say he's not a choker? Will that help us? to post it for the millionth time? Or shall we cry tears of pain about it?
this is what was said that you intially responded to.These guys biggest issues are they wanted the rags to riches story to end better than it did
I agree that Romo at that time was a better qb but I also believe the 2014 team was better and that team failed not sure what makes these guys think 2016 was gonna be any different
Steve likes to argue he was finally healthy which he may have been but he was also fairly healthy in 14
Romos problem is he wanted the big play all the time or too often which made him vulnerable in pocket more often than he needed to be IMO
The cowboys brass should be kicked in the arse for calling plays to put Romo in position to get hurt again to begin with
It’s easy to play Monday morning qb and say we’ll Romo would have done better than rookie Dak but it’s hard to argue with how well Dak played that year
That said it could have also given us insight to how Dak would play in postseason for his career
He’s had 2 good games 2 ok games but his butt cheeks appear to clinch tight when it matters most but that could be said about entire team
That's right. I'm not sayin he would have STAYED healthy. We don't know what would have happened. But on the other hand...one cannot say "he would have gotten hurt anyway".
Very presumptuous given he really did get fully healthy...FINALLY...for probably the first time in his career. And I gave ALL credit to Dak for that.
I'm being fair here. I'm not even gonna say we woulda won the SB...like some FOR REAL "over the top" fans are saying.
this is the kind of things you call facts or stats ^?I don't need to answer the quesiton.
I'm simply pointing out your agenda. That's it. That's all I wanted to say.
You ain't in charge, kid. I can say what I want when I want.
not sure I see NYC cowboys as a troll necessarily cause his name isnt frequent in Romo vs dak threads but most everyone had to know it was going to end up like this it always does.wow, this thread brought out the Romo Lovers and explains a lot of the Dak hate.
Romo was 1-3 in the playoffs. barely winning one because the ref handed the game to dallas at home. He wasted a #1 seed and mustered only 17 points in a home playoff game. he had plenty of good teams around him and just couldn't get over the hump. he dreamed of being like Favre, except he was nowhere close to being that good. one of the most over rated cowboys ever.