Alabama is very much like Arkansas to me. Very pretty in spots but Texas is a better place to live. I like the states with a lot of forests & country. I have none of that in the ATL!
What ATL has though is a great infrastructure and technology and culture base.
You can like actually do things like shop, go see pro sports, concerts and other events.
In much of the deep south Target is about as upscale as it gets for shopping and fine dining is quite tasty but outside New Orleans lacks any subtle flair or variety.
Tons of fried catfish and chicken though.
The problem with the Network is not that there is no interest. Heck, my Wife would buy it no matter what the cost was today, but we can't. Here, we can't get LHN because we are Comcast and they don't have it. I think once that is resolved, it will be fine. The problem with Texas is not the LHN, it's tackling and defensive execution.
I agree that their decision will be based on who's available but Texas is not going to go out and give somebody a 20 Million Signing Bonus and a 10 Million Dollar a year 5 year contract with option for somebody who might end up gone in 3 years. That's bad business and Texas is not about making bad Business decisions. If they went after a Saban or the like, they would demand that he be there for an extended period of time. Otherwise, they don't get their money's worth on the deal. That's not Texas and I just don't see a Coach like Saban being worth his word on something like that. That's just my opinion of course.
I don't think this is accurate.
A title can earn Texas up to 50m in ONE SEASON. The increased revenu in the last title season was actually well over 50m and very probably got them the LHN.
Whatever they pay a coach if he wins 1 TITLE he makes that worthwhile.
The reason they have already been checking Saban's pulse is he is the closest guarantee to winning a title.
Plus the Big 12 plays everyone once with NO Title game something Saban is interested in.
Texas with Saban can go 7-5 this year but hire him and be top 5 next year pre-season.
Texas doesn't need Saban for 10 years. They need him for 4. He'd give them the best game day coach they've had since the 60s and he'd bring in the top class in the country next year without even bothering to Ole Miss(buy) people. He'd set up the program so any of the top guys could walk in and run it. you'd gett he young coach you want but one that was given a chance to succeed. That's not really the case right now. The talent is overhyped, soft and needs a very real kick in the pants. Saban is the guy for that.
Chris Simms said he felt UT often was too easygoing and lackadaisical until they'd get beat by OU then they'd start really playing football. He basically said Mack runs a soft crew.