yimyammer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,574
- Reaction score
- 7,004
Thanks. My mouth is bleeding now.
![Laugh :laugh: :laugh:](/smilies/laugh_norm.gif)
Thanks. My mouth is bleeding now.
What if keeping Jason Garrett is a better idea?
Truth is.. life with Garrett hasnt been too bad. We have had many 8-8+ seasons, have won division numerous times and Garrett is the mastermind behind our current playoff push. A new coach brings so many unknowns.
My opinion is, resign Garrett for 2020 and give Garrett an ultimatum: Win SB or go home..
good one, i like funny. You funny... And probably was a supporter of hiring Garrett. I knew he was a looser. When did you see it? Did i spell everything correctly?Here's your big time couch...
![]()
Smarter than Einstein, but doesn't know the difference between 'couch' and 'coach'.
Every year with Garrett is a lost year. I lost 10 of them watching him pretend to coach.This year was never expected to be a lost year. Wth are you talking about?
Very good pointI'll be in the huge minority here, but I do believe Garrett will leave a special legacy behind after he's gone; a very positive one at that. He built 2 of the 5 greatest QBs in Cowboys history with his bare hands. I have a feeling Dak won't quite be what you have come to expect once Garrett leaves. He doesn't know winning playoff games, he doesn't seem to have that Parcells/Belichick nasty side where players become too afraid to lose. But what he does have is a special connection to the quarterback position. Andy Reid has it, Frank Reich has it, Doug has it when his confidence is up, Walsh had it.
Not saying Garrett is anywhere as good as those coaches. But he didn't 'accidentally' fall into 2 of the biggest QB steals of the last 20 years. Romo was already good when Garret came in. He was great when he left. Dak has been better than any 4th round pick I can remember since Jared Allen. That doesn't happen in New York, in Arizona, in Denver, in Jacksonville. It happens with Jason Garrett.
Not saying don't fire him. He's earned whatever's coming. But it may irrevocably affect Dak, especially if the next guy is not QB-centric.
What if keeping Jason Garrett is a better idea?
Truth is.. life with Garrett hasnt been too bad. We have had many 8-8+ seasons, have won division numerous times and Garrett is the mastermind behind our current playoff push. A new coach brings so many unknowns.
My opinion is, resign Garrett for 2020 and give Garrett an ultimatum: Win SB or go home..
My kid does like himOP has to be related to Garrett. Mentioned in another post that "Garrett is beloved in their family"![]()
come on now you just want us to keep him because he sucks.I'll be in the huge minority here, but I do believe Garrett will leave a special legacy behind after he's gone; a very positive one at that. He built 2 of the 5 greatest QBs in Cowboys history with his bare hands. I have a feeling Dak won't quite be what you have come to expect once Garrett leaves. He doesn't know winning playoff games, he doesn't seem to have that Parcells/Belichick nasty side where players become too afraid to lose. But what he does have is a special connection to the quarterback position. Andy Reid has it, Frank Reich has it, Doug has it when his confidence is up, Walsh had it.
Not saying Garrett is anywhere as good as those coaches. But he didn't 'accidentally' fall into 2 of the biggest QB steals of the last 20 years. Romo was already good when Garret came in. He was great when he left. Dak has been better than any 4th round pick I can remember since Jared Allen. That doesn't happen in New York, in Arizona, in Denver, in Jacksonville. It happens with Jason Garrett.
Not saying don't fire him. He's earned whatever's coming. But it may irrevocably affect Dak, especially if the next guy is not QB-centric.
does bill belichicks legacy get diminishded because afc east is usually bad?The mastermind? What playoff push? How is he getting credit for the rest of the division sucking? Otherwise he is the mastermind of a 6-7 team on its way to 6-10. Is that you, Brill?
Garrett can't even get to big games.True, but he seems to choke alot in the "big games"
good one, i like funny. You funny... And probably was a supporter of hiring Garrett. I knew he was a looser. When did you see it? Did i spell everything correctly?
Garrett had nothing to do with developing Romo. Romo saved Garrett's bacon more times than I want to remember. Doubt he has anything to do with developing Dak either.I'll be in the huge minority here, but I do believe Garrett will leave a special legacy behind after he's gone; a very positive one at that. He built 2 of the 5 greatest QBs in Cowboys history with his bare hands. I have a feeling Dak won't quite be what you have come to expect once Garrett leaves. He doesn't know winning playoff games, he doesn't seem to have that Parcells/Belichick nasty side where players become too afraid to lose. But what he does have is a special connection to the quarterback position. Andy Reid has it, Frank Reich has it, Doug has it when his confidence is up, Walsh had it.
Not saying Garrett is anywhere as good as those coaches. But he didn't 'accidentally' fall into 2 of the biggest QB steals of the last 20 years. Romo was already good when Garret came in. He was great when he left. Dak has been better than any 4th round pick I can remember since Jared Allen. That doesn't happen in New York, in Arizona, in Denver, in Jacksonville. It happens with Jason Garrett.
Not saying don't fire him. He's earned whatever's coming. But it may irrevocably affect Dak, especially if the next guy is not QB-centric.
He wins SB's.does bill belichicks legacy get diminishded because afc east is usually bad?
you're a good poster keep posting.