Dave_in-NC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,049
- Reaction score
- 5,132
Dead horse but I don't see any way you can say that ball 100% hit the ground.
You watch it in real time speed and realize that he is falling...slo mo shows that the ground dislodges the ball......what do you call it honestly
According to the rules, it is a catch. The way they called it, it wasn't.
every timeAll of this is moot if Dez just secures the ball and makes sure he's got the first down on a 4th down play. He had no business reaching out, the 1st down was way more important than the TD in that scenario.
I think the one that stumps me is, if a receiver reaches for a catch on the sideline, gets two toes in and then has it slip out on the way out of bounds... what is that? Incomplete?
Whether Dez caught the ball in play, on the sidelines or in the end zone, he must maintain control of the ball throughout the process of the catch when he goes to the ground, clearly he did not, the ball came lose when he hit the ground, so therefore it would be an incomplete pass regardless where he caught it on the field...it was the correct call, I hate the rule, always have, but it's the rule....
The rule has been quoted many times in this thread. There are three components to establishing possession, all of which Dez achieved before he hit the ground.Rules, please?
I've seen similar type plays several times, and they're usually incomplete passes because the ball touches the ground.
But it was continuous with the catch. If he had caught the pass, secured it, stops and then starts running towards the end zone, then if the ball comes out it's still a catch, assuming he recovers it.
But that's not what happens. Almost immediately after catching it, his motion carries him to the ground. You can't tell whether he's stretching out or whether he's falling as a result of the catch.
It was ruled correctly, according to the rules.
try taking the time and read and comprehend the ruling by the NFL....now if you can't understand that, I can't help you, IT"S CRYSTAL CLEAR!!
Didn't matter as originally called (catch, down by contact), because the ground can't cause a fumble.Dead horse but I don't see any way you can say that ball 100% hit the ground.
It doesn't help his case. Stetatore said that there was never a 'move common to the game' (aka a football move). Dez clearly extended not only his arm but his entire body (body went from flexion to extension in biomechanical terms).
Sorta like this play by Miles Austin against the Niners in 2011:
And we've seen this move many times before. It was a 'move common to the game' (aka a football move).
Stetatore says IN PRINT that he didn't see this move and that's why he said it wasn't a catch.
Hence, if this move actually occurred then his ruling is *wrong*.
This move actually occured (and the ball was secure). Stetatore did not interpret the rule incorrectly. Either that, or the countless times we've see players like the picture were called incorrectly.
YR
The lunge and extension constitute advancement of the football. If you can't see that I can't help you. The explanation for Jim Crow laws were clear too and they were stupid as well. He had caught the ball two steps before he extended. That was the clear thing.
it doesn't matter if it's in the end zone, side line or field of play, it's an incomplete pass
Didn't matter as originally called (catch, down by contact), because the ground can't cause a fumble.
It only matters in the "revised" version of the call, which says the catch had not been completed yet.
That's what I mean. The revised version of the call said the pass was never completed.One explanation was the ground CAN cause an incompletion.
The rule has been quoted many times in this thread. There are three components to establishing possession, all of which Dez achieved before he hit the ground.
No no no. One of the most athletically gifted football players clumsily fell forward 15 feet towards the goal line while extending his body by complete accident. Therefore not a football move ~ steratore