Beast_from_East
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 30,140
- Reaction score
- 27,231
I'd find it hard to believe, too, if I took any of that stuff in the context you're presenting it in. Fortunately, it didn't happen in that context. The 'training' comment was in relation to Garrett's entire time in Dallas, not necessarily his job this year as head coach. I don't recognize the 'butting in' remark, but do remember him positioning removing play calling from Callahan, which I hardly see as a negative for Jason Garrett. Wanting Garrett to have more influence defensively *does* sound like him having influence on that side of the ball, to me.
No doubt, Jerry's still Jerry and he's still going to meddle in the composition of the staff, and it's still a bad thing. But the organization has been more stable and more methodical under Garrett than it was under Phillips. From it's approach to the draft to it's approach to the roster. We've had a lot of churn on the coaching staff, for sure, and false-started with the defensive coaches. I'd put those mostly on Jason, though, with the possible exception of replacing Rob Ryan last year.
You seem to be one of the only posters on this board that thinks "it didn't happen this way".
Jerry called Garrett a trainee and said we would benefit from "all of his in game mistakes" down the road.........................................................yea, it did happen like that.
Jerry said it was "unfair" that Garrett would not let Callahan call the offense the way he wanted to call it............................................................yea, it did happen like that.
Jerry said that Garrett was going to spend all his time of defense this year, even though he has never coached one down of defense..............yea, it did happen like that.
Now if you want to pretend this was all taken out of context, that is your prerogative. However, I think many more posters will agree with my assessment than yours.