PA Cowboy Fan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,773
- Reaction score
- 50,168
We'll probably lose one of those games even if Zeke plays.No such thing as a "weak team" when Garrett is coaching...
We'll probably lose one of those games even if Zeke plays.No such thing as a "weak team" when Garrett is coaching...
We'll probably lose one of those games even if Zeke plays.
There was an NFL agent on the radio last week that said this exact same thing. Basically that this was a blessing in disguise. Essentially that if Dak can’t carry you to wins in those first three games against those cupcakes without Zeke then you know what you have in him. It’s an interesting way to look at it.If I was the gm I would welcome the hold out. If played correctly by Jerry and son you could set this up as a 2-3 game contract rehearsal for Dak. If he shines you pay him, if he doesn’t you look to get a better deal with him.
I would look to sign Zeke after week 1 or 2 and get him back and ease him in kinda the same way they did with Emmitt in 93.
And they act like this is the same team as 2 years ago when he got suspended.All these talking heads, NFL analysts, act like Zeke is the only RB that can be successful in Dallas. I disagree.....
No such thing as a cupcakes in the NFL, especially division games. The agent that said that is a clown. How often do NFC East teams blow each other out?There was an NFL agent on the radio last week that said this exact same thing. Basically that this was a blessing in disguise. Essentially that if Dak can’t carry you to wins in those first three games against those cupcakes without Zeke then you know what you have in him. It’s an interesting way to look at it.
well you have a good idea there, too bad you cant tell the jones boys lol.If I was the gm I would welcome the hold out. If played correctly by Jerry and son you could set this up as a 2-3 game contract rehearsal for Dak. If he shines you pay him, if he doesn’t you look to get a better deal with him.
I would look to sign Zeke after week 1 or 2 and get him back and ease him in kinda the same way they did with Emmitt in 93.
Is this not the last season of Daks contract? Maybe that’s whyWhy.. This is regular season. You want the best team you can put together on the field. Win as much as you can. Don’t waste a game.
Maybe that’s what they are up towell you have a good idea there, too bad you cant tell the jones boys lol.
I never said that. It’s just to help the inflated price tag, please read.By all means, after three seasons, 51 starts, plus three off-seasons to make a full evaluation of Dak, let's make the big decisions on him based on 2 games.
Well the last SB winner in this division had a margin of victory in the double digits against other East opponents. So when you’re good you usually don’t sweat out games against bottom 5 in the league opponents. But to me whatever you want to call these first three opponents is just semantics. The bottom line is you open with three games that you should and darn sure better win. Especially with how tough the final stretch is. If Dak needs Zeke to beat that caliber of team, I think that frames these negotiations in a new light.No such thing as a cupcakes in the NFL, especially division games. The agent that said that is a clown. How often do NFC East teams blow each other out?
You won’t but Jerry will.Under no circumstances do I pay Zeke with two years left on his current contract .
I won't be held hostage by anyone .
If I was the gm I would welcome the hold out. If played correctly by Jerry and son you could set this up as a 2-3 game contract rehearsal for Dak. If he shines you pay him, if he doesn’t you look to get a better deal with him.
I would look to sign Zeke after week 1 or 2 and get him back and ease him in kinda the same way they did with Emmitt in 93.
Anybody agreeing with this line of thinking should never be able to talk about how long it’s been since Dallas has won anything.
It’s not a guaranteed thing but this team can be really good this year and they need all their pieces in place.
You may be right, but at what expense does that come in terms of the future. How large is the championship window if all of the guys are signed now? One Year?
It's exactly what you said. A "2-3 game contract rehearsal" where they negotiate terms based on how he does in the first couple games. If those are good games, they offer him more. If they're bad games, they offer him less.I never said that. It’s just to help the inflated price tag, please read.
If I was the gm I would welcome the hold out. If played correctly by Jerry and son you could set this up as a 2-3 game contract rehearsal for Dak. If he shines you pay him, if he doesn’t you look to get a better deal with him.
I would look to sign Zeke after week 1 or 2 and get him back and ease him in kinda the same way they did with Emmitt in 93.
It's exactly what you said. A "2-3 game contract rehearsal" where they negotiate terms based on how he does in the first couple games. If those are good games, they offer him more. If they're bad games, they offer him less.
By all means, after three seasons, 51 starts, plus three off-seasons to make a full evaluation of Dak, let's make the big decisions on him based on 2 games.[/QUOTE]
I never said that ^
I said you could use it to negotiate. I never said "a full evaluation". Don't be a moron.