The Murray Mistake

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,965
Reaction score
50,818
What are you talking about?

Getting rid of Murray wasn’t a mistake.

Who they replaced him with was the mistake.

Pollard is a way better player than Zeke.
Duh.
What are you talking about?

We're trying to replace a starting type RB w/ a backup type. Almost exact same scenario.

Pollard is not a starter. Double Duh.

Honestly, this is a case of you guys not thinking before you post. Weak sauce.
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,121
Reaction score
16,168
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
TP is good. O-line is not opening up any holes for him. We’re also trying to run him up the middle too much. Was hoping to see some improvement after the bye.
For TP we're not opening any holes.... But zeke was trash.
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,121
Reaction score
16,168
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Context matters, none of these rbs will have a great average if they are killing clock.

When it counts he's ran well more often than not. I'd just like to see him get some more quality touches before deciding he sucks.
He has shown enough to get some carries. You are not wrong.


Some fragile people just HATE that their guy they been propping up might either be not quite as good as they yelled, or just needs help like any other player might.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,584
Reaction score
86,000
What are you talking about?

We're trying to replace a starting type RB w/ a backup type. Almost exact same scenario.

Pollard is not a starter. Double Duh.

Honestly, this is a case of you guys not thinking before you post. Weak sauce.

Nah this is a case of you being hyper focused on the Cowboys and not looking around the entire league.
 

TexasHillbilly

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,436
Reaction score
3,334
Mistake? Murray was bad the rest of his career after Dallas decided to move on. I wouldn’t call that a mistake
I thought Murray was really good but his fumbling issues drove me crazy. The one against GB with a clear field in front of him was enough for me. He left for more money but was never the same after he left the Cowboys.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,669
Reaction score
12,381
Replaced a starter w/ a non starter.

Talk about weak comprehension.
talk about a weak argument.

Starter performed worse than the nominal backup. More rushing yards. More receiving yards.

Here's some insight as you clearly are new to the game -- when the backup clearly outperforms the "starter" then he needs to replace the starter.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
39,702
Reaction score
36,789
Pollard is better than Elliott. Elliott is gassed. The mistake is not finding another quality back. Dowdle is PS fodder
I think the better comparison than the Murray situation is the receiver situation last year.

We paid and elevated a role player to a bigger role even though that player was coming off a season-ending injury (Gallup/Pollard).

We brought in a cheap veteran to be that player's backup (Washington/Jones).

We spent a non-premium draft pick on a secondary option for that role (Tolbert/Vaughn).

And we thought a UDFA might could handle it instead when the backup options didn't work out (Houston/Dowdle).

Of course, since we relied on Noah Brown when those options failed, it's not a perfect comparison. But it does show that we don't learn from our mistakes.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
39,702
Reaction score
36,789
What are you talking about?

We're trying to replace a starting type RB w/ a backup type. Almost exact same scenario.

Pollard is not a starter. Double Duh.

Honestly, this is a case of you guys not thinking before you post. Weak sauce.
We made an offer to keep Murray, but Philly offered him more than we were willing to match. We also brought in former first-round pick Darren McFadden as his replacement. I don't think we ever saw any of his backups as a replacement.
 

KMY_Amber

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,739
Reaction score
1,650
The Cowboys are a passing team. The mistake was trying to force a conservative game plan on Dak and company.
I agree with BC.

The Cowboys no longer have the offensive line to simply pound the rock, the "3 yards and a cloud of dust" days are long gone. The Cowboys need to realize that this is Dak's Team, and they will only excel when Dak excels (or if the defense utterly dominates with turnovers and sacks/pressures). Anything this offense gets on the ground is gravy at this point. I hope McCarthy realizes this moving forward, just as he did on Sunday against the Rams.

The offensive game plan on Sunday was spot on, congrats to MM, the Texas Coast offense coming into focus:
  • Lots of play action, especially on 1st down, with variety (bootlegs, 3-step quick drops, and even longer 5-step drop, longer-developing plays)
  • Significantly less first down runs, especially early in the game
  • More outside runs
I would like to see more use of Pollard in the passing game so he can get in space (screens, middle drag routes or in routes, and flairs out of the backfield). Pollard doesn't need 20 carries, but I would like him to get more touches throughout the game. And I like mixing in Dowdle. After Sunday, I finally feel like this offense is headed in the right direction...

...and that certainly means that this team should run less, and use the short passing game to TEs and RBs more. And even if the offense isn't even really running the ball, still use play action liberally, because most teams still respect Pollard enough to honor the run fake.

I loved Zeke, but he no longer fit well into the offense. The Cowboys made the right decision moving on...
 

cowboys5xsbs

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,869
Reaction score
20,345
What are you talking about?

Getting rid of Murray wasn’t a mistake.

Who they replaced him with was the mistake.

Pollard is a way better player than Zeke.
Duh.
Murray was still putting up 1000 yard seasons in Tennessee letting him go was bad in retrospect
 
Top