News: The NFL is considering some major rule changes: 14 things to know

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,021
Reaction score
22,611
The NFL is considering some major rule changes: 14 things to know
By John Breech | CBSSports.com

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on...ing-some-major-rule-changes-14-things-to-know
Thanks to 19 rule proposals, the NFL's 32 owners are going to be busy when they convene in Florida next week for their annual meeting.

Some of the proposals are major (eliminating chop blocks), some are minor (making players wear jersey vests) and some are awesome (the Commanders want to eliminate preseason overtime). No matter how big they are though, they're all going to be discussed at the annual league meetings March 20-23 in Boca Raton, Fla.

For a proposal to become an NFL rule, it has to get a "yes" vote from 24 of the league's 32 owners.

Here are 14 things to know about the NFL's potential rule changes for 2016:

1. Touchbacks no longer at the 20-yard line. One of the biggest rule changes proposed by the competition committee this year is to change the touchback. Under the proposed new rule, any kickoff that results in a touchback would give the opposing the team the ball at the 25-yard line instead of the 20. As the rule is currently written, teams would only get the ball on the 25-yard line after a touchback on a "free kick," meaning a touchback after a turnover or a punt would still give the opposing team the ball at the 20-yard line.

2. Make the extra point rule permanent. When the NFL changed the extra point rule for the 2015 season, the competition committee only made it a one-year change, which means there's no extra point rule on the books for 2016. This rule proposal will likely pass and make last year's change permanent, which means kickers better get used to those 33-yard extra points.

3. Automatic ejection for any player who receives two personal foul penalties in one game. This rule proposal by the competition committee is likely going to pass, but there are going to be some caveats. As CBSSports.com colleague Ryan Wilson outlined on Wednesday morning, only two types of personal fouls would be considered for ejection. Taunting, punching or kicking would count against a player's two-penalty limit. Hitting a defenseless players, using the crown of your helmet or hitting a quarterback egregiously late would also count toward the two-penalty limit.

4. Make personal foul penalties reviewable. If personal fouls are going to lead to ejections, then they should be reviewable, right? That's what the Commanders want. Under this proposal from Washington, personal fouls could be reviewed and potentially be overturned

5. Make all chop blocks illegal. There are only a few instances where chop blocks are currently legal and the competition committee wants to get rid of those. Under the rule proposal, all chop blocks would be illegal. Currently, if an offensive lineman chops a defensive player "while the defensive player is physically engaged above the waist by the blocking attempt of another offensive teammate," then the chop is legal...
 

Junglist

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,326
Reaction score
1,294
Making a personal foul reviewable? That may be one of the dumbest proposed rules I've ever heard. Wow.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,310
Reaction score
102,240
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
#11 is interesting. Never seems right that if a team was on the 1 yard line and a false start, or 2 really don't cost them anything. Holding even more, it doesn't matter. But a defensive holding, a five yard penalty can turn a 3and 30 into a 1st down.
But move the 1st down marker accordingly, then it makes it that much harder.
Of course they always want to change rules to help the offense and not the defense. So I doubt this one passes.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,310
Reaction score
102,240
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The defensive holding should actually be a spot foul, and then add the five yards. It either results in a first down or it doesn't.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
The rule that's crying out to be changed is conspicuous by its absence.

sam-shields-dez-bryant-nfl-divisional-round-dallas-cowboys-green-bay-packers.jpg
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,870
Reaction score
11,569
6. Each team gets three challenges per game. One thing became clear with all the rule proposals this year: Teams are not happy with the current challenge system. Currently, each NFL teams gets two challenges per game and can earn a third one if they win their first two. Under a rule change proposed by the Ravens, each team would get three challenges no matter what. The Vikings and Commanders have also proposed similar rules that would give each team three challenges, so there's a good chance this one will pass.

Stupid. I'm not even sure most games have enough plays that are worth 2 challenges. They review all scoring plays, all turnovers, and everything else inside of 2 minutes. There's hardly anything left to review. A non-scoring, non-turnover, big play.

I guess it's fitting since the rules are normally geared towards the offense.

Instant replay in general is awful. More often used as a reason to look for any possible reason to take away a play that should stand, rather than negating an officiating mistake.

Take it out of the game all together.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
We want more excitement so we move the PAT but then we reward Touchbacks and eliminate one of the most exciting plays, the KO returns.
 

gmoney112

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,589
Reaction score
15,694
We want more excitement so we move the PAT but then we reward Touchbacks and eliminate one of the most exciting plays, the KO returns.

Wait, isn't the rule actually encouraging KO returns now? Since a touchback now starts on the 25 instead of 20, you have a reason to actually kick a fieldable ball.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Wait, isn't the rule actually encouraging KO returns now? Since a touchback now starts on the 25 instead of 20, you have a reason to actually kick a fieldable ball.

I read it as not taking it out of the endzone if you get it at the 25, less returns
 

Biggems

White and Nerdy
Messages
14,327
Reaction score
2,254
I got my special teams rule change last year where defense can return for 2 pts.

Now I need 2 more. Increase roster size to 60 and make at least 53 active. Make all fgs 60 yds or longer worth 4 pts.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
#1 is indeed strange, it could be seen as both an attempt to reduce or increase returns. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind that one.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
Making a personal foul reviewable? That may be one of the dumbest proposed rules I've ever heard. Wow.

College basketball is doing it.

In fact, I just saw a play reviewed today that the ref missed but after review it was a technical foul. I agree with you though , if you're going to start doing that for football it's going to be brutal. Take the Josh Norman OBJ game last year. You would've had to review virtually every other play to see if there was or wasn't a personal foul.
 
Top