The NFL, UFC, and NBA want to speed up the process of removing illegal sports streams

CowboysRule

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,476
Reaction score
4,994
How about a trade? NFL pays taxes and then they get a complete lockdown on illegal streaming. BTW, I do not use illegal streaming myself, but the NFL cannot complain when they don't even pay taxes.
They gave up their tax exempt status several years back. The actual NFL office doesn't generate that much money in comparison to the teams. All teams are taxable entities and pay taxes.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
61,998
Reaction score
63,127
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I dont get what your saying , how would they lose on that. in fact what advertising revenue??
Networks, such as CBS, NBC, etc., fight for broadcast rights. The NFL's product are its games, which the networks bid for broadcast rights. The NFL sells its broadcast rights for billions.

In turn, the networks recoup and profit from selling commercials to advertisers. Networks determined how much to charge advertisers for commercials based on its calculation of anticipated audience size per commercial. The more eyes expected to see each commercial, the higher the networks will charge advertisers per commercial.

Pirating reduces the size of the calculated audience in which the networks determine how much to charge per commercial. For example, FOX calculates the audience size for a Rams/Chargers will average 5 million viewers. The network determines the ad rate for 5 million viewers as $500,000 for a 30-second commercial.

Conversely, the pirated audience size is 500,000. FOX has devalued its anticipated ad rate. If it had not, the network could have possibly charged at additional $50,000 for the 30-second ad spot.

Additionally, the NFL computes the value of its audience by calculating the size of that audience, which the networks are bidding for. Knowing this allows the league to decide what is an acceptable winning bid from the networks, in particularly an opening bid for broadcast rights.

In summary, the league could boast its winning bid contract by the numbers siphoned away by pirating. Aggressively going after pirating benefits the networks' rate for charging advertisers, which benefits the NFL's goal of maximizing how much it can potentially profit from selling its broadcasting rights.
 

shabazz

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,480
Reaction score
35,591
Surprisingly it may one day be cheaper to go to a game than watch it at home…..well maybe not.
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,620
Reaction score
16,507
Networks, such as CBS, NBC, etc., fight for broadcast rights. The NFL's product are its games, which the networks bid for broadcast rights. The NFL sells its broadcast rights for billions.

In turn, the networks recoup and profit from selling commercials to advertisers. Networks determined how much to charge advertisers for commercials based on its calculation of anticipated audience size per commercial. The more eyes expected to see each commercial, the higher the networks will charge advertisers per commercial.

Pirating reduces the size of the calculated audience in which the networks determine how much to charge per commercial. For example, FOX calculates the audience size for a Rams/Chargers will average 5 million viewers. The network determines the ad rate for 5 million viewers as $500,000 for a 30-second commercial.

Conversely, the pirated audience size is 500,000. FOX has devalued its anticipated ad rate. If it had not, the network could have possibly charged at additional $50,000 for the 30-second ad spot.

Additionally, the NFL computes the value of its audience by calculating the size of that audience, which the networks are bidding for. Knowing this allows the league to decide what is an acceptable winning bid from the networks, in particularly an opening bid for broadcast rights.

In summary, the league could boast its winning bid contract by the numbers siphoned away by pirating. Aggressively going after pirating benefits the networks' rate for charging advertisers, which benefits the NFL's goal of maximizing how much it can potentially profit from selling its broadcasting rights.
most of what you say is true, but tv ratings are determined solely by the neilsen ratings which are estimates based on the sample group
they physically monitor.
That is what the networks use to determine ad prices.
Pirating aka file sharing has no effect on the Nielsen ratings.
Nfl ratings have not gone down, just up for many years.
The nfl uses the same nielsen ratings on what they charge the networks.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
61,998
Reaction score
63,127
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
most of what you say is true, but tv ratings are determined solely by the neilsen ratings which are estimates based on the sample group
they physically monitor.
That is what the networks use to determine ad prices.
Pirating aka file sharing has no effect on the Nielsen ratings.
Nfl ratings have not gone down, just up for many years.
The nfl uses the same nielsen ratings on what they charge the networks.
Okay.
 

dogberry

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,007
Reaction score
773
What will the new laws that the leagues want do that current laws aren't doing?

We have a subscription to our local newspaper. I think the four tv stations are better at breaking news. I don't stream.
 
Top