Are you trying to argue that Romo isn't a better QB than Prescott? If not what's the point of your post? Are we really going this route? Where play on the field and seeing with your own eyes doesn't matter because of the team's record?
The hypocrisy is starting to rear its ugly head around here. Now it's the coaching or the receivers or the offensive line or the defense where as before it was just the QB couldn't win when it mattered.
I wonder how long before Dak is labeled a choker? It took Romo losing his 1st playoff game. Dak has already done that.
Are we talking about Dak in the fourth game of his second season vs Tony Romo at that stage in his career?
No hypocrisy here. I've been against Garrett literally from day one. I was also one of Romo's biggest fans. I've also not been a fan of a Dez since day one. As far as the OL, this is the first season we've really had to deal with a regression, so not sure where that's coming from. Maybe you need to read around a little bit before you start popping off.
Know what I saw today? A QB throw for 259 yards on 20/36 passing, with 3 scores. In fact, he should have had four touchdowns but one was dropped. He also threw a strike for a first down on the final drive that was, you guessed it, dropped. You're telling me that's not good, adequate or even acceptable play for you?
I don't even have to ask, because I know, Romo had some VERY bad games his second season. Hell, he had them his whole career. I saw the talent though and he made more plays than he missed. He was also a wizard when things broke down. Kind of like.... you guessed it, Dak Prescott!
The point of my post, was that Dak is still learning and growing. He's not going to look like an all pro every day, but he was very good for 3/4 of the game today.
You may want to arrange your thoughts a little better before you call anyone a hypocrite, because that's exactly what you look like.