The official hang Bledsoe thread

I have no idea if Romo is truly ready, but I know where you guys are coming from. It gets to the point where you get tired of seeing the same tired act.

When Drew was in NE people were always screaming for backup Michael Bishop....who ended up being dumb or terrible or whatever.

The backup QB is always the most popular player on the team when you're losing.
 
ABQCOWBOY said:
Nope. Romo played for a contract, but the comp for starting QB was never a possability. It hasn't been since Bledsoe was signed.
If it wasn't a possibility you wouldn't have everyone and their brother, including Troy Aikman, calling for Romo to start next week.
 
PatsWin2002 said:
Bingo. He has made that his trademark. He did it in NE and Buffalo too.

I don't know why people are surprised when Drew does what he has ALWAYS done.

I'm not a basher, either. I was pulling for you guys today. It's just that I'm very familiar with Drew's work. :p:

I know it, you know it, and many others know it. I am just trying to figure out why there are some who do not see it? I seriously wonder what it would take for those people?
 
What stinks is this is exactly what to expect if we're fortunate enough to make the playoffs. On the road, against a good defense, we'll surely face pressure. That's a given, I dont care who it is. Teams that advance in the playoffs have QBs that make plays(improvise) under pressure. Bledsoe is arguably the worst in the league at this. He's a sitting duck and throws INTs
 
he's too slow and makes too many stupid decisions for him to be the starter of the Dallas Cowboys
 
Bledsoe had a very bad game.

If the next one goes this way, maybe Parcells pulls the plug and prepares to use Romo over the bye week.
 
gbrittain said:
He is not a Hall of Famer. He is what he has always been and that is a not so good QB.

Dallas will not win with Bledsoe at the helm.

What will it take for people to realize that Bledsoe will never lead this team anywhere. Seriously what will it take?
could :bang2: not agree more
 
3 picks, some big throws to make it look like he knows what he's doing and well, we picked up right from where we left off last year.

Call it reactionary, call it, knee jerk, call it whatever you want, but start Romo and let Bledsoe be the vet back up we need and start grooming Romo now. If this is what we can expect, yet again, from Bledsoe, we ain't going anywhere this year anyway.

Get Romo ready.


Oh yeah, and find a healthy kicker!
 
JohnsKey19 said:
What stinks is this is exactly what to expect if we're fortunate enough to make the playoffs. On the road, against a good defense, we'll surely face pressure. That's a given, I dont care who it is. Teams that advance in the playoffs have QBs that make plays(improvise) under pressure. Bledsoe is arguably the worst in the league at this. He's a sitting duck and throws INTs
I agree and have argued the same point over recent weeks.
 
I hope the Bledsoe bashers on this thread and others have the nuts to come back after week six when we are 4-2 or 5-1 with Bledsoe still QBing and admit you were writing him off after week 1.

4 completions in the second half alone were called backu because of penalties.
Crappy field position and unimaginative play calling (and an uninspired D) had a helluva a lot to do with it too.
 
ElPanadero said:
Get a rope...

I thought I already did that!:D

noose.jpg
 
Hey hey hey! Bledsoe may have thrown three ints, but let's not forget the great job he did hitting jags players in the chest two other times and they dropped them (three if you include the reviewed int, but he went ahead and threw it back to them at the end anyways). Musta been the dark jerseys...

:p:
 
PatsWin2002 said:
I have no idea if Romo is truly ready, but I know where you guys are coming from. It gets to the point where you get tired of seeing the same tired act.

When Drew was in NE people were always screaming for backup Michael Bishop....who ended up being dumb or terrible or whatever.

The backup QB is always the most popular player on the team when you're losing.
Hey I know a backup QB behind Bledsoe that did alright. The guy went on to win 3 Super Bowls and be one of the best QBs ever. How does that work for your argument?
 
Tripod said:
I hope the Bledsoe bashers on this thread and others have the nuts to come after week six when we are 4-2 or 5-1 with Bledsoe still QBing and admit you were writing him off after week 1.

I'm not sure if Romo is a better option at this point, but I do know Bledsoe SUCKED today. And it wasnt the line. It wasnt the coaching. It was him missing wide open receivers and throwing the ball to the other team.

'Bledsoe bashers' are perfectly within their rights to complain
 
Tripod said:
I hope the Bledsoe bashers on this thread and others have the nuts to come after week six when we are 4-2 or 5-1 with Bledsoe still QBing and admit you were writing him off after week 1.

4 completions in the second half alone were called backu because of penalties.
Crappy field position and unimaginative play calling (and an uninspired D) had a helluva a lot to do with it too.
i bet that plenty of people here would be happy to take your money on that wish.:lmao2:
 
BLEDSOE PLAYED LIKE **** TODAY I AGREE BUT PEOPLE ARE GETTING TO CARRIED AWAY. ITS STILL ONLY 1 GAME. BUT HE WAS BAD:bang2:


WE HAD SO MANY CALLS THAT WENT BACK.

THAT BS INTERFERENCE HURT US. HOW DOES HE PUSH HENRY LIKE THAT AND THERES NO CALL AT ALL?

THEN WE KEPT GETTING CALLED FOR PENALTIES EVERY TIME WE MOVE THE BALL. WE KILLED OURSELVES A LOT DURING THIS GAME
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,349
Messages
13,868,734
Members
23,790
Latest member
MisterWaffles
Back
Top