Schoon is a better blocker and will be equal to Schultz receiving. He wasn't a reach at 58. Not at all. I'm glad they moved on from Schultz and that paycheck. Give me that rookie deal.
BTW the FO didn't feel like TE was a need. They wanted to improve the blocking. A chance to upgrade the blocking and replace Schultz fell into their laps.
What do you have right now to measure and based that off of ..?
Dude is a rookie with zero camp, ..zero pads,.. zero live games ..and has zero skins on the wall that proves that right now..
- Sure we have "expectations " and hope that Schoon will become the equal or better than Schultz as a receiver.
And it's a major job and level of competition between college and the NFL.
That could be more of an adjustment period than expected at the early stages.
- If you're taking a TE that early as the 2nd round, that would indicate "need " to me than what was expected.
And that would also indicate that there was something about their current TEs in Ferguson, Hendershot that they were not
content in the status quo. ..that they had to address in the early rounds.
- Of course we've all heard about the draft "rumors " that had the Cowboys targeting another Dalton-name TE in the first round. (Dalton Kincaid)
but the Bills seemingly anticipating Cowboys interest, trading up to bypass us to take Kincaid.
- BTW, .reportedly per David Moore, the TE they were targeting in the 2nd round (before the Schoon pick) at their spot was Iowa's Sam Laporta ..
but the Lions quickly nabbed him before our pick.