The refs' "missed" fumble on Schultz changed the entire complexion of the game

[superonyx]

You actually whimpered when you typed that.

And you moaned when you typed that.
Make sure you give MarcusRock a courtesy reach around.

 

[RonnieT24]

Ok it was a fumble and schultz recovered. Dallas ball. You win i guess?

The refs cheated Goodell and Co. of a chance to review the play and stick it to the Cowboys.. They're all doing Bears games the rest of the season.

 

[blueblood70]

PI was debatable there. But was clear hands to the face

Or illegal; contact either way an INT that should have never happened. yet in the GB OT we don't get an obvious call..smh..how many more do we have to suffer and yet have our own fan calling for that to be a fumble LOL

 

[BleedSilverandBlue]

You saw the truth, not what your brain told you to see as part of some ego self-preservation thing. Glad there's still a few of us out there.

Turning this into some bizarre meta commentary on being a truth seeker is nothing short of comedic gold.

If you pause the video the knee is down, or so very close to down that it would make sense the call on the field would not have been over turned. Dallas clearly recovered the ball afterwards too so isn't this entire discussion moot? Am I missing something?

 

[shabazz]

Yet another one disappointed in a Dallas win.

not applicable. He’s a bigger fan of the refs than the Cowboys.

 

[blueblood70]

Turning this into some bizarre meta commentary on being a truth seeker is nothing short of comedic gold.

If you pause the video the knee is down, or so very close to down that it would make sense the call on the field would not have been over turned. Dallas clearly recovered the ball afterwards too so isn't this entire discussion moot? Am I missing something?

TY perplexing our own fan base debating for this to be a truth,,lmao.crazy thread topic to start in your own fan forum.,. makes zero sense..

UNLESS, MR is closet colt fan and was hoping we lost..hmm

 

[BleedSilverandBlue]

TY perplexing our own fan base debating for this to be a truth,,lmao.crazy thread topic to start in your own fan forum.,. makes zero sense..

UNLESS, MR is closet colt fan and was hoping we lost..hmm

I simply cannot believe this ridiculous thread is at 13 pages of complete and utter nonsense now.

 

[MarcusRock]

I simply cannot believe this ridiculous thread is at 13 pages of complete and utter nonsense now.

I mean, I'm no Plato but did you like it? Lol.

 

[BleedSilverandBlue]

I mean, I'm no Plato but did you like it? Lol.

I actually only read the first page and the last page. You really are quite the philosopher.

Can a CowboysZone thread be nominated for a Pulitzer prize?

 

[shabazz]

I actually only read the first page and the last page. You really are quite the philosopher.

Can a CowboysZone thread be nominated for a Pulitzer prize?

Pulitzer Prize is a poor example. I’ve seen it it awarded and not returned to and from journalists who’s story’s have been proven untrue. I’d hate to link @MarcusRock to a corrupt and broken entity

 

[JW82]

Knee down before the ball came out.

yup. Non issue

 

[G2]

Maybe you can see inside the heads of refs to know what their motives are but I'm an enigma, bro. From whence I come and whence I go is like vapor. My ways are as puzzling as a nil-nill tie in soccer. You can't trace me.

In short, you're just very gassy.

 

[ESisback]

Turning this into some bizarre meta commentary on being a truth seeker is nothing short of comedic gold.

If you pause the video the knee is down, or so very close to down that it would make sense the call on the field would not have been over turned. Dallas clearly recovered the ball afterwards too so isn't this entire discussion moot? Am I missing something?

So much time arguing against Cowboy fans questioning the over-abundance of odd coincidences that loses games for Dallas, but starts a thread denouncing odd coincidences that actually assist Dallas. A normal person may wonder where the loyalties truly lie.

 

[Runwildboys]

Not unless they think a positive play could be reversed.

I've seen teams do it just to trick the defense into using a timeout.

 

[john van brocklin]

Looks like we are heading to 20 plus pages on another thread that should be clearly not needed.
LOL, I don't get it.
Shultz recovered the ball, so even if he fumbled it makes no difference.

 

[Runwildboys]

? Lol. Not sure why the attitude. And thanks for not answering the question.

He did give you an unnecessary attitude, but he also gave you an answer, which is "We don't know why they hurried."

 

[MarcusRock]

So much time arguing against Cowboy fans questioning the over-abundance of odd coincidences that loses games for Dallas, but starts a thread denouncing odd coincidences that actually assist Dallas. A normal person may wonder where the loyalties truly lie.

Now the entire fanboi crew has been here. Welcome, good sir! Just so you know, you'll always be my first. Lol.

 

[ESisback]

I've seen teams do it just to trick the defense into using a timeout.

Even if it truly WAS a fumble, Shultz recovered it! The point is moot! But let’s just say they gave the Colts the ball. Does any normal person without an agenda think the Colts would have won had they recovered on that play?

 

[Runwildboys]

Looks like we are heading to 20 plus pages on another thread that should be clearly not needed.
LOL, I don't get it.
Shultz recovered the ball, so even if he fumbled it makes no difference.

Thing is, it's the ones making the counterpoint who really kept this thread going unnecessarily. It should've been fairly obvious to them that he didn't really care about the way the play was called, and that he was just putting them through the motions. Just the fact that he used a still photo, after repeatedly saying in numerous other threads that you can't use a still photo as evidence in cases like this.

 

[Runwildboys]

Even if it truly WAS a fumble, Shultz recovered it! The point is moot! But let’s just say they gave the Colts the ball. Does any normal person without an agenda think the Colts would have won had they recovered on that play?

Hey, I was just adding another perspective! lol But whether Marcus actually believes this was a fumble or not, he started the thread to rile people up. (Sorry if that ruins your fun, Marcus, but this has to end somewhere!)