Cowboys5217
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,210
- Reaction score
- 13,462
This thread is nothing more than Marcus' sunk cost fallacy in action. "I'll show them!" as his thread blows up in his face.
It's consistent with how they've called fumbles in the past. It's like "continuation" in basketball where if it starts to come out and does in the process of the player going down, they give credit for a fumble. Here's one they called on Zeke. Ball starts to come out, he touches down and then the ball comes free from his body. It's consistent.
![]()
I would need to see a couple other angles on this to say one way or another.
Knee down before the ball came out.
A fumble call will only be reviewed or reversed if there is a clear recovery by the other team. There was no review because Shultz re-gained possession of the ball. This has been pointed out a ridiculous number of times for this thread to still be going.I'm going to disagree. Read But like, a friendly disagreement. Because I'm glad it wasn't called.
Dont you literally get mad at anyone posting still photos on this site? lolHere is the photo of the ball out. Schultz barely has one hand on the ball with the Colts player pouncing on it with 2 hands. The Colts player let go once the ref right there immediately blew his whistle vehemently saying Schultz was down. He clearly wasn't. Egregious non-call.
![]()
Why did we rush to the line then in the standard snap before they challenge move? I had people arriving then so I honestly missed the play.
Dont you literally get mad at anyone posting still photos on this site? lol
Apparently lolI'm a complicated man. Lol.
MarcusRock and Calpolytechnique both have been exposed as nothing more than trolls in this thread.
How sad does your life have to be to create a thread claiming it changed the game in our favor when we won by almost 40 AND Schultz recovered the "fumble" which is why Saturday didn't bother to challenge it.
It's sort of awkward to even watch 2 people argue a moot point for 12 pages already. It's just toxic.
? Lol. Not sure why the attitude. And thanks for not answering the question.You have no idea and asking the question doesn't make it so. We don't know why they did or did not do anything and you do not get to speak for MM.
Thanks!It was not a clear fumble. Seems like the knee was down before losing the ball.
Ok it was a fumble and schultz recovered. Dallas ball. You win i guess?You saw the truth, not what your brain told you to see as part of some ego self-preservation thing. Glad there's still a few of us out there.
It really helps in analyzing video to be able to go frame by frame, back and forth.
I've watched it a half dozen times, but I can't tell, because I can't catch the precise timing of events at different locations. Maybe it's because I'm doing this on a tv instead of a phone, so it's a wider field of view.