fwiw
Colin Cowerd thinks Denver is a bad idea for Romo. Good for Denver but bad for Romo.
http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/colin-cowherd-tony-romo-denver-broncos-030117
quote..
“It would not be my choice. Denver has a defensive-minded head coach. He is a rookie head coach. Outside of their center, they have a weak offensive line, and that division is tough. Derek Carr twice a year, Kansas City’s loaded roster twice a year, and Philip Rivers has always moved the football on Denver.
"I get Denver wanting Tony, but that’s the toughest division in football, you have a bad offensive line. You have a rookie, defensive head coach, and the November-December weather is rough."
--------------------------------------
He likes Houston much better for Tony and I agree.
Cowherd: Houston is a much better destination for Romo
“If you go to Houston, you get a veteran — not a rookie. A veteran offensive coach. You get a tremendous defensive roster like Denver. You get better offensive receivers, weaker division, you play inside, and you’re playing in nobody’s shadow.
There’s no pressure in Houston.
"There’s pressure with John Elway in Denver to win, because they’ve already done it multiple times. And if you don’t win in Denver, you’re a ‘failure.’ Even if you get close in Houston, you’re a success.
"‘Well Colin, Peyton Manning chose Denver!’ It was different. At the time, Oakland was terrible, now they may be the second-best team in the AFC. When Peyton Manning chose Denver, Kansas City was terrible, they were 2-14. Denver had a very good offensive line, not a weak one. And you were replacing Tim Tebow! So your entry point for Peyton Manning was completely different.”
But there are big obstacles in both scenarios