The World Cup Thread

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
Team USA might want to stop playing like tough guys today and flop around the pitch like Euro teams and get some free kicks.

In all seriousness, though, that's what I like about our guys - they don't play like pansies.
 

daschoo

Slanje Va
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
613
that was tight, think he was marginally offside. damn it goal for in-ger-land
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
**** that. He was most definitely NOT offside.

FIFA can suck a fart out of my ***. This is bush league.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
wow! they ****ed us out of another goal! the world is getting scared that we are becoming a threat. they know we have the best athletes and if we start taking soccer seriously it would be a rap.
 

daschoo

Slanje Va
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
613
Rampage;3441266 said:
wow! they ****ed us out of another goal! the world is getting scared that we are becoming a threat. they know we have the best athletes and if we start taking soccer seriously it would be a rap.

:laugh2:
 

daschoo

Slanje Va
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
613
Rampage;3441276 said:
what's so funny?

it was a marginal offside. my initial reaction was he was just offside but after seeing replays and freeze frames he may have been in line, the linesman doesn't have the luxury of slow motion replays and has to make the call on what he sees in real time. you have been on the receiving end of two dubious decisions the last two games that are costing you massively at the moment but to suggest its part of a massive conspiracy to keep the game from taking off in the u.s.a because the rest of the world is scared you'd dominate is funny. particularly when you've spent the last few weeks complaining about the rest of the world apparently trying to shove the sport down your throat and make you like it.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
daschoo;3441282 said:
it was a marginal offside. my initial reaction was he was just offside but after seeing replays and freeze frames he may have been in line, the linesman doesn't have the luxury of slow motion replays and has to make the call on what he sees in real time. you have been on the receiving end of two dubious decisions the last two games that are costing you massively at the moment but to suggest its part of a massive conspiracy to keep the game from taking off in the u.s.a because the rest of the world is scared you'd dominate is funny. particularly when you've spent the last few weeks complaining about the rest of the world apparently trying to shove the sport down your throat and make you like it.
show me where I said this? also do you disagree that wwe(USA) produces the best athletes?
 

daschoo

Slanje Va
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
613
Ren;3441286 said:
England winning makes me a sad panda :mad:

not looking good but still got 45 mins so hopefully america can find a goal and the slovenians a couple
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
daschoo;3441282 said:
it was a marginal offside. my initial reaction was he was just offside but after seeing replays and freeze frames he may have been in line, the linesman doesn't have the luxury of slow motion replays and has to make the call on what he sees in real time. you have been on the receiving end of two dubious decisions the last two games that are costing you massively at the moment but to suggest its part of a massive conspiracy to keep the game from taking off in the u.s.a because the rest of the world is scared you'd dominate is funny. particularly when you've spent the last few weeks complaining about the rest of the world apparently trying to shove the sport down your throat and make you like it.

Marginal my ***....and you sure as hell don't raise that flag in that situation unless its certain. Benefit in the box is usually given to the attacker. You just don't take away legit goals...it's far more acceptable to give a questionable goal than it is to take away a legit one.

That was yet another HUGE **** up by FIFA officials. They've royally **** the bed....and at this point, it looks like the its going to cost the US advancement, when they should actually be leading the group. Pathetic.

IMO, of course. ;)
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
On second thought....if the US side misses another wide open net again, I'm not sure they deserve to advance anyway. :mad:
 

daschoo

Slanje Va
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
613
Rampage;3441291 said:
show me where I said this? also do you disagree that wwe(USA) produces the best athletes?

i was referring to the anti soccer thread. i would say best athletes is probably too open to interpretation to claim anyone definitively produces them

tomson75;3441298 said:
Marginal my ***....and you sure as hell don't raise that flag in that situation unless its certain. Benefit in the box is usually given to the attacker. You just don't take away legit goals...it's far more acceptable to give a questionable goal than it is to take away a legit one.

That was yet another HUGE **** up by FIFA officials. They've royally **** the bed....and at this point, it looks like the its going to cost the US advancement, when they should actually be leading the group. Pathetic.

IMO, of course. ;)

benefit of the doubt is supposed to go to the attackers yes. like i said though my initial reaction, as a neutral - well i have money on an american win, was that he was offside so it would be hypocritical of me to now lambast the linesman for seeing it the same way. also the commentators here never picked up on it till they saw a replay so it wasn't just me. as it stands you're a single goal away from winning the group anyway so might not cost you yet
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
daschoo;3441312 said:
i was referring to the anti soccer thread. i would say best athletes is probably too open to interpretation to claim anyone definitively produces them



benefit of the doubt is supposed to go to the attackers yes. like i said though my initial reaction, as a neutral - well i have money on an american win, was that he was offside so it would be hypocritical of me to now lambast the linesman for seeing it the same way. also the commentators here never picked up on it till they saw a replay so it wasn't just me. as it stands you're a single goal away from winning the group anyway so might not cost you yet

Understandable.

This was the first time I've made an attempt to follow the sport since my college playing days. Sadly, I think the things that pushed me away from the sport are far worse now than ever. Even with a US victory here, I'm not sure I'll be watching soccer again. The diving and officiating are so poor, that I can't fathom why anyone would enjoy this. It's on par with WWE wrestling at this point.

US just missed another perfect opportunity. They just can't put it in the net. Sad, and incredibly frustrating.
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
Another **** call. Should have been red pulled on the foul against Dempsey....and another against Beasley.

Unbelievably horrible officiating. :mad:
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
Lmao!!!!!!!!

YES!!!


Ok....I'm not going to lie.

I just jumped and hit my head on an eight foot ceiling.

I'll stop *****ing....but my earlier sentiment stands. :)
 

daschoo

Slanje Va
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
613
heartbreak for the slovenians! if only upson hadn't got across in injury time england would have been out. of course the commentators have them back winning the tournament.
 
Top