Rampage;3441266 said:wow! they ****ed us out of another goal! the world is getting scared that we are becoming a threat. they know we have the best athletes and if we start taking soccer seriously it would be a rap.
what's so funny?daschoo;3441271 said::laugh2:
Rampage;3441276 said:what's so funny?
show me where I said this? also do you disagree that wwe(USA) produces the best athletes?daschoo;3441282 said:it was a marginal offside. my initial reaction was he was just offside but after seeing replays and freeze frames he may have been in line, the linesman doesn't have the luxury of slow motion replays and has to make the call on what he sees in real time. you have been on the receiving end of two dubious decisions the last two games that are costing you massively at the moment but to suggest its part of a massive conspiracy to keep the game from taking off in the u.s.a because the rest of the world is scared you'd dominate is funny. particularly when you've spent the last few weeks complaining about the rest of the world apparently trying to shove the sport down your throat and make you like it.
Ren;3441286 said:England winning makes me a sad panda
daschoo;3441282 said:it was a marginal offside. my initial reaction was he was just offside but after seeing replays and freeze frames he may have been in line, the linesman doesn't have the luxury of slow motion replays and has to make the call on what he sees in real time. you have been on the receiving end of two dubious decisions the last two games that are costing you massively at the moment but to suggest its part of a massive conspiracy to keep the game from taking off in the u.s.a because the rest of the world is scared you'd dominate is funny. particularly when you've spent the last few weeks complaining about the rest of the world apparently trying to shove the sport down your throat and make you like it.
Rampage;3441291 said:show me where I said this? also do you disagree that wwe(USA) produces the best athletes?
tomson75;3441298 said:Marginal my ***....and you sure as hell don't raise that flag in that situation unless its certain. Benefit in the box is usually given to the attacker. You just don't take away legit goals...it's far more acceptable to give a questionable goal than it is to take away a legit one.
That was yet another HUGE **** up by FIFA officials. They've royally **** the bed....and at this point, it looks like the its going to cost the US advancement, when they should actually be leading the group. Pathetic.
IMO, of course.
daschoo;3441312 said:i was referring to the anti soccer thread. i would say best athletes is probably too open to interpretation to claim anyone definitively produces them
benefit of the doubt is supposed to go to the attackers yes. like i said though my initial reaction, as a neutral - well i have money on an american win, was that he was offside so it would be hypocritical of me to now lambast the linesman for seeing it the same way. also the commentators here never picked up on it till they saw a replay so it wasn't just me. as it stands you're a single goal away from winning the group anyway so might not cost you yet