sbuscha;2978486 said:Wide Reciever on this team...Crayton and RW can not get it done.
sbuscha;2978486 said:Wide Reciever on this team...Crayton and RW can not get it done.
dbair1967;2978500 said:Clearly another original thread.
gUnit;2978521 said:Roy had 4 catches for 75-yds. Not a bad game.
Oh, and he kept his mouth shut and didnt piss and moan.
Better than Steve Smith, and he's suppose to be top notch.
what does that make T-OLD then? Roy has better numbers than that baby in Buffalostilltheguru;2978526 said:This was known in the offseason to anybody who has seen Roy Williams play in the past for more than one game.
sbuscha;2978486 said:Wide Reciever on this team...Crayton and RW can not get it done.
sbuscha;2978486 said:Wide Reciever on this team...Crayton and RW can not get it done.
stilltheguru;2978530 said:If we covered Smith one on one with Newman like Roy was covered one on one, it would've gotten UGLY. You dont guard number 1's with one corner most of the game. You do that with number 2 recievers like Roy.
sbuscha;2978486 said:Wide Reciever on this team...Crayton and RW can not get it done.
TheSport78;2978510 said:We need a speedy slot receiver like Danny Amendola
Rampage;2978532 said:what does that make T-OLD then? Roy has better numbers than that baby in Buffalo
zrinkill;2978558 said:I disagree
We have 2 receivers who are having a better year than the guy we used to have.
Roy has 8 catches for 179 yards and 1TD in 3 games
Crayton has 8 catches for 183 yards and 1TD in 3 games
That old guy has 5 catches for 98 yards and 1TD in 3 games
That is a fact ....... sorry.