This weird narrative that’s going around media and fans is the Cowboys should’ve addressed tackle before now. First off the narrative is a lie. They have addressed tackle in the middle of the draft. Now if the argument is they should’ve addressed it in the first round? The only time it made sense was Slater over Parsons and that would’ve set this team back years.
So when was this suppose to happen? When we drafted Lamb? Diggs? When?
I completely get this line of thought. The Cowboys really only had one good chance to draft Tyron's replacement and that was Slater, by giving up Parsons to do it. You cannot fault Dallas for taking Parsons who has changed the defense. With no real opportunities to draft a quality OT, the Cowboys went in other directions. Understandable. Plus, we do not know that the Cowboys were not looking at OTs to possibly replace Tyron. Maybe they were and they didn;t think anyone on the board was worth it, or the guy they had in mind was taken. This year they draft a LT to convert to LG. But they were playing him at LT some early so the thought has been in their minds.
But it is baffling that they did not prepare for what we all knew was coming, an injury to Tyron Smith. Of course the worst case scenario is a season ending injury, not something that would cost him 3 or 4 games. In the past they signed a backup for him. This is the first year they didn't and the worst case scenario fell on them.
On the other hand, if they drafted Tyler Smith with the idea of moving him to LT some day, then why not move him out there now? It is not a new position for him. And if he plays well out there, they look like geniuses for drafting a guy who could play inside or kick outside.