These Chiefs fans think they're gonna embarrass us

[ABQCOWBOY]

Haha. Not a bad idea. Thanks for the splendid suggestion.

No trouble at all.

 

[Proximo]

I'm sorry, I was not aware that you were clairvoyant. However, since you clearly are clairvoyant, how is it that you don't know that I tried to explain this to this poster before the game but well, he didn't listen. Now, I will again try to explain it after the game. I'm kinda shocked that you didn't already know this. Maybe you should lay off on your Clairvoyance Abilities and just read the thread. You can probably get the entire picture. On the other hand, perhaps not.

You have yourself a Great Day yourself there Fella.

You missed my point entirely. My post had nothing to do with the content that was posted in this thread prior to the game being played.

I was commenting on the fact that the moment the game ended you rushed into this thread to tell another poster that "they don't know what they're talking about". I was simply stating that I hope this makes you feel better about yourself as well as today's loss.

 

[Wheeltax]

The Chiefs didn't embarrass us because we did that ourselves

 

[CATCH17]

They're offense can't keep up with ours? On Paper maybe.

We'll tap the breaks on our offense almost the entire game. There will be a lack of urgency and tempo with a mix of penalties.

It's going to be close.

Well well well.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

You missed my point entirely. My post had nothing to do with the content that was posted in this thread prior to the game being played.

I was commenting on the fact that the moment the game ended you rushed into this thread to tell another poster that "they don't know what they're talking about". I was simply stating that I hope this makes you feel better about yourself as well as today's loss.

This discussion started last week. I have actually not been online since last week, before today. When I got online today, I logged into the Chat for the game. That typically keeps me busy during the game. After that, I checked responses and what did I find, that post.

Now, perhaps it is not I who has missed the point here. Have you read the thread? Do you agree with the posters pinion? Nothing I said was inaccurate or untrue. The idea that Orton is better then Smith is clearly inaccurate and by now, I would expect that most have seen that for their own eyes. Since 2011, the guy is like 25-6. Perhaps you should ask yourself why you are invested in this conversation at all?

 

[Proximo]

This discussion started last week. I have actually not been online since last week, before today. When I got online today, I logged into the Chat for the game. That typically keeps me busy during the game. After that, I checked responses and what did I find, that post.

Now, perhaps it is not I who has missed the point here. Have you read the thread? Do you agree with the posters pinion? Nothing I said was inaccurate or untrue. The idea that Orton is better then Smith is clearly inaccurate and by now, I would expect that most have seen that for their own eyes. Since 2011, the guy is like 25-6. Perhaps you should ask yourself why you are invested in this conversation at all?

You're still missing my point dude. I'm not talking about the content of the thread. I'm not talking about whether you're right or wrong. I'm talking about the fact that the moment the game ended you rushed into this thread to tell that other guy that "he doesn't know what he's talking about".

That's how you roll? Awesome. I was just asking you if doing that made you feel better about the loss. That's all.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

You're still missing my point dude. I'm not talking about the content of the thread. I'm not talking about whether you're right or wrong. I'm talking about the fact that the moment the game ended you rushed into this thread to tell that other guy that "he doesn't know what he's talking about".

That's how you roll? Awesome. I was just asking you if doing that made you feel better about the loss. That's all.

No, I don't think I am. I get what you are saying but the fact is that I did not read his response till after the game was over. Had I read it earlier, I would have responded earlier. You are drawing conclusion based on no knowledge of the situation.

So again I ask you, did you read the thread?

 

[Proximo]

No, I don't think I am. I get what you are saying but the fact is that I did not read his response till after the game was over. Had I read it earlier, I would have responded earlier. You are drawing conclusion based on no knowledge of the situation.

So again I ask you, did you read the thread?

It doesn't matter when you read the other poster's response.

The fact remains that the moment the game ended you were in here rubbing it in another posters face telling them that they "don't know what they're talking about". I was just asking you if this made you feel better about yourself and the loss. You have yet to answer.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

It doesn't matter when you read the other poster's response.

The fact remains that the moment the game ended you were in here rubbing it in another posters face telling them that they "don't know what they're talking about". I was just asking you if this made you feel better about yourself and the loss. You have yet to answer.

Hey, whatever. If the content of the actual thread, the actual discussion, is not relevant, then I can't expect your view to be any more so. The truth is that he was wrong, as are you. He was wrong when he made the comment, he was wrong yesterday, he is wrong today, as are you.

It does not make me feel any better today then it would yesterday or tomorrow. How bout you? You feeling better?

 

[Cebrin]

Hey, whatever. If the content of the actual thread, the actual discussion, is not relevant, then I can't expect your view to be any more so. The truth is that he was wrong, as are you. He was wrong when he made the comment, he was wrong yesterday, he is wrong today, as are you.

It does not make me feel any better today then it would yesterday or tomorrow. How bout you? You feeling better?

I'm feeling better after that nap. What did I miss? No really, I agree with you here 100%, Smith is a better QB. The idea that Orton is better is asinine. That being said, throwing 25-6 as a point of proof isn't saying much. SF is primed to win. It's like that Superbowl that Barry Switzer won. Not saying he's a bad coach, not saying Smith isn't a solid QB. Let's be honest though, both were set up far better for success than poor Romo here. As a matter of fact, they were handed a gold mine and underachieved. Oh, I also rub my dogs noses in their urine when they pee in my house. You were totally in the right.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

I'm feeling better after that nap. What did I miss? No really, I agree with you here 100%, Smith is a better QB. The idea that Orton is better is asinine. That being said, throwing 25-6 as a point of proof isn't saying much. SF is primed to win. It's like that Superbowl that Barry Switzer won. Not saying he's a bad coach, not saying Smith isn't a solid QB. Let's be honest though, both were set up far better for success than poor Romo here. As a matter of fact, they were handed a gold mine and underachieved. Oh, I also rub my dogs noses in their urine when they pee in my house. You were totally in the right.

I don't really dispute what you say here about Smith. I do think that a record of 25-6 is pretty darn good and while I can not find the link, he's also got a QB Rating of something like 95.0 over that same period. He's much better then a lot of people give him credit for IMO. The guy has only thrown 10 ints in that same time frame. Also recall that Smith was in San Fran for a lot of the bad years as well. I do not believe Smith is better then Romo is but I think the seperation, especially in Pork Chop's offense, is a lot closer then many believe. I just think it's crazy for our Fans to look at games like the KC game and believe that Smith is not a good QB and KC is not a good offensive team and their Defense is not good and then they go in and beat us and we complain.

I just don't understand that mind set. That team was better then us today. A lot of that is our own fault but a lot of that is also because KC played better.

As far as the Dog thing, it is what it is. This is a message board and if your going to make statements like Orton is better then Smith, well, you know what is coming.

 

[Cebrin]

I'm feeling better after that nap. What did I miss? No really, I agree with you here 100%, Smith is a better QB. The idea that Orton is better is asinine. That being said, throwing 25-6 as a point of proof isn't saying much. SF is primed to win. It's like that Superbowl that Barry Switzer won. Not saying he's a bad coach, not saying Smith isn't a solid QB. Let's be honest though, both were set up far better for success than poor Romo here. As a matter of fact, they were handed a gold mine and underachieved.

I don't really dispute what you say here about Smith. I do think that a record of 25-6 is pretty darn good and while I can not find the link, he's also got a QB Rating of something like 95.0 over that same period. He's much better then a lot of people give him credit for IMO. The guy has only thrown 10 ints in that same time frame. Also recall that Smith was in San Fran for a lot of the bad years as well. I do not believe Smith is better then Romo is but I think the seperation, especially in Pork Chop's offense, is a lot closer then many believe. I just think it's crazy for our Fans to look at games like the KC game and believe that Smith is not a good QB and KC is not a good offensive team and their Defense is not good and then they go in and beat us and we complain.

I just don't understand that mind set. That team was better then us today. A lot of that is our own fault but a lot of that is also because KC played better.

As far as the Dog thing, it is what it is. This is a message board and if your going to make statements like Orton is better then Smith, well, you know what is coming.

79.6 is his Career QB rating. I agree though, he's a good game manager. KC is a damn good team, and I thought that last year too, despite their record. Sometimes a good team is just poorly managed. Andy Reid knows how to win games. Now if we can only teach Jason Garrett how too. A lot of talent here in Dallas being wasted.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

79.6 is his Career QB rating. I agree though, he's a good game manager. KC is a damn good team, and I thought that last year too, despite their record. Sometimes a good team is just poorly managed. Andy Reid knows how to win games. Now if we can only teach Jason Garrett how too. A lot of talent here in Dallas being wasted.

Yes, but you must remember that he played on a lot of bad San Fran teams. The 95 QBR was from 2011 to current or during the 25-6-1 run.

I agree. A lot of talent going to waste right now.

 

[iceman117]

I'd like to think that at this point everyone pretty much realizes that no game is a given and any team could take an L any week, but let's not go nuts here pumping up the Chiefs. What have they done to make ANYONE think that they're "most likely a playoff team this year in the AFC"?? Gimme a break guy.

They won a pathetic grand total of 2 games last year, got rid of their coach, then got fat Andy and Alex Smith and all the sudden they're a likely playoff team? Please.

3-0 like I said "most likely a playoff team"... "So you give me a break guy" and last year has nothing to do with this year "please"....