superpunk
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,330
- Reaction score
- 75
theogt;1818129 said:And it just goes back to there being outrageous homers, and there being people that were right.
The Romo "homers" were right. It wasn't a great performance in that game, obviously, but no one said it was. That's just a strawman you've neatly constructed. But anyone looking at that game objectively as a first performance in an NFL game should come away saying that guy has spectacular potential. Some didn't at the time. They just couldn't get past the 3 INTs when evaluating his performance.
Maybe you talked to different people.
Also, it wouldn't be a strawman. Maybe "revisionist history", if that's what you're going for. I know that isn't nearly as important-sounding, but it's probably more accurate for what you're attempting to describe.