This is coming from a Dak Fan

[TwentyOne]

But saying I'm pinning one sentence from the OP.....

When this was the actual exert
"Having said the forgoing, it seems like Dak is trying to become the highest paid player ever. I think that’s really short sighted. This is a really bad look for Dak and is really souring me on Dak."

Almost half of his entire post. Pretty misleading on your part.

Read the next paragraph.

You are pinning on one sentence to make your argument fitting for you: DAK is not looking for the highest contract. But what is the conclusion? What do you want to say with that, other then trying to find something wrong in the op?

To me the point of the op is that DAK is greedy. He wants the most money he can get out of his career. And with that priority he does not care about the franchise, the team, possible other achievements (SB wins for example) etc...

And i think you understood that too when you read the op. Thats why you try to prove it wrong. And thats why you tried to find the smallest mistake in his post to turn things around in your favor.

But you are right by stating that DAK doesnt want to get the highest contract. But again imo that wasnt the point of the op. Yes, dak wants a short contract so he is able to get at least a 3rd contract in his career. And all we can expect is that the cap will explode in the next 2 to 3 years. Dak wants all the money he can get, regardless of the consequences for his social surrounding. Well, i dont like these kind of people.

 

[TwentyOne]

If it was trivial, then why ask it? And then ask it a second time. Sounds really silly to me.

To get out earlier after the CAP explodes. If he wanted to be on record as the highest paid player ever he would sign a longer term contract with more money included.

So: why would Dak want a shorter term contract if he wanted to be known for being the highest paid player in the NFL?

Your second answer was a trivial statement in Relation to your first answer. Not my question.

Please read what i write and dont try to turn things around so it fits your agenda.

To answer your answer read my post above this one.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

Your second answer was a trivial statement in Relation to your first answer. Not my question.

Please read what i write and dont try to turn things around so it fits your agenda.

To answer your answer read my post above this one.

You were wrong, let's just move on.

 

[TwentyOne]

You were wrong, let's just move on.

Haha. Ok, i am wrong. You are right.

I made a note about you in my black book. So i dont forget what you need to hear the next time we both get into an Argumentation.

 

[jnday]

Interestingly enough, on that 92-93 team, there were no Pro Bowl players on Defense. I believe they were all Offense.

Strike two! You have totally destroyed his last two post which were not based on any facts. Nothing is worse than seeing Cowboy fans downing their own HOF players in an effort to make average modern-day players look good.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

Strike two! You have totally destroyed his last two post which were not based on any facts. Nothing is worse than seeing Cowboy fans downing their own HOF players in an effort to make average modern-day players look good.

Honestly Jn, I wasn't trying to destroy his points. I was just reading the posts and when the question was raised, I got curious so I just looked it up. I was not surprised that there were only 6 Pro Bowlers on that team but I was surprised that there were no Defensive guys that made the team.