This is so comical

Predictable, no substance from you, just whining. The play was a good design, bad read. I like Dak. He's just not good right now.
and if things don't change he will never be good this is a bad team with a staff that has no idea how to turn things around
 
The point here is that you seem to think this was some great play call design by the Cowboys that Dak screwed up when in fact, by any rational thought process, the play was defended properly by the Texans (they weren't fooled) and it comes down to whether or not Beasley can make a play.

So let's dispel with the notion that this was brilliance by the coaching staff only to be let down by the player(s) again.
The DB looks to be at the spot 5 yards ahead of Beasley

DpATFa2X0AAbj4C.jpg


DpAXgN-X4AUi5av.jpg
 
What made that call so good?

Are you denying that the Texans weren't fooled? No one said Beasley couldn't have gotten the first down if he had the ball pitched to him. We are saying that lamenting the Dak hand off because the play call was great and Beasley would have definitely gotten the first down is impossible to guarantee.

Between you and Idgit, I don't know who is the bigger coaching staff fan boy. I really wonder what it's going to take for you to admit that this staff really isn't as good as you think.
Beasley in the backfield had me shaking my head, it should have been Austin. Beasley hates to get tackled watch him when he knows he is going to get hit he goes down. With Austin in the backfield the defense has to key on 3 guys, Dak, Zeke and Austin. Putting Beasley back there accomplishes about as much as putting Chris Jones back there.
 
What made that call so good?

Are you denying that the Texans weren't fooled? No one said Beasley couldn't have gotten the first down if he had the ball pitched to him. We are saying that lamenting the Dak hand off because the play call was great and Beasley would have definitely gotten the first down is impossible to guarantee.

Between you and Idgit, I don't know who is the bigger coaching staff fan boy. I really wonder what it's going to take for you to admit that this staff really isn't as good as you think.


To make it even clearer that you have no clue. Because it didn't work, doesn't make it a bad play design or play. Only ignorance would allow that kind of conclusion.
 
bad teams do dumb things that lose football games that's pretty much what it is with the cowboys

This ....

Dak slides inbounds, clock runs - Texans don't get 1:49 left.... But he ran out

1st down runs in red zone.... Unbelievable play calling here folks--play action was wide open on 1st down all night long

I could go on.... It's not one thing, a multitude of bad decisions
 
To make it even clearer that you have no clue. Because it didn't work, doesn't make it a bad play design or play. Only ignorance would allow that kind of conclusion.

The point is that you want to call it a great play call only to have the coaches undermined by their players again, when in fact, it wasn't a brilliant call. It was defended properly by Houston and would have required Beasley or Dak to make a play if Dak had kept the ball.

Further, I even just stated that it's possible that Beasley could have gotten the first down. The point is that you claim it's a great call because he definitely would have gotten the first down when, in fact, you have no idea if he would have.

In the end, maybe Dak screwed up. But the idea that the option was "wide open" ergo it was a great call that Dak screwed up is a reach at this point.
 
The point is that you want to call it a great play call only to have the coaches undermined by their players again, when in fact, it wasn't a brilliant call. It was defended properly by Houston and would have required Beasley or Dak to make a play if Dak had kept the ball.

Further, I even just stated that it's possible that Beasley could have gotten the first down. The point is that you claim it's a great call because he definitely would have gotten the first down when, in fact, you have no idea if he would have.
 
Wallow in your misery,

I am just fine thank you. I am not so invested in this guy that I have to lie to myself and try to convince myself that we really are lucky to have such a fine coaching staff led by Jason Garrett.

I wonder what it's going to be like when you finally wake up to the realization you've backed what essentially is a dog all these years?
 
I am just fine thank you. I am not so invested in this guy that I have to lie to myself and try to convince myself that we really are lucky to have such a fine coaching staff led by Jason Garrett.

I wonder what it's going to be like when you finally wake up to the realization you've backed what essentially is a dog all these years?
Lol...oh you're invested. It's why you whine so much..lol
 
To make it even clearer that you have no clue. Because it didn't work, doesn't make it a bad play design or play. Only ignorance would allow that kind of conclusion.

Would you please stop being a whiny baby and answer the question? What made the call good? The evidence appears to show even your Beasely option was DOA.
 
Would you please stop being a whiny baby and answer the question. What made the call good? The evidence appears to show even your Beasely option was DOA.
Looks as if you're the one whining, I'm laughing all you. The design gave the an 3 option to get a 1st , a good setup. Now what's funny is you who sees that because it was stopped , it wasn't a good design. Typical thinking by an average joe
 
Looks as if you're the one whining, I'm laughing all you. The design gave the an 3 option to get a 1st , a good setup. Now what's funny is you who sees that because it was stopped , it wasn't a good design. Typical thinking by an average joe

So, you have no answer? "3-options" is not an answer. *WHY* was it a *GOOD* design?
 
Ive seen this team....trust me theres nothing comical about them

They cause me indigestion, i cant even eat during games because i might pull the food back out and throw it against the wall in disgust
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,012
Messages
14,506,663
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top