It was very cold in that Ravens game the week before, so little wonder. Brady led NE back from 14 points twice in that game, one of his greatest performances ever. Harbaugh's another coach that's always making excuses.
The football in the Ravens game was below the projected PSI. That's why the NFL setup the investigation the following week against the Colts. Winning a game doesn't mean that you didn't cheat. Just like if you lose...it still doesn't mean that you didn't cheat.
The texts you refer to occurred 8 months before the game, in the middle of the previous summer/offseason. They had nothing to do with the AFCC game that year. McNally's job description was to inflate/deflate the footballs as needed to get them between 12.5 and 13.5, bring them to the refs, then to the field. So if the other guy calls him the inflator or deflator while texting **** back & forth, that's not exactly proof of much, is it. And there were no texts specifically stating getting paid for deflating footballs. This was all Wells trying to weave a conspiracy together cause he had nothing else.
The texts over the 8 month period show a pattern of behavior of deflating footballs.
The texts discussed Brady requesting McNally to deflate the footballs for payment. If McNally's job is to legally keep the footballs at 12.5 PSI, you wouldn't pay him extra to do so. You only make a payment if he has to do something illegal. When Brady was late paying McNally, McNally was furious and stated that if he didn't get payment soon enough, he would over-inflate them to the size of a rugby ball (of course he was exagerrating). Jastremski later on made sure that McNally was happy with the payment that he received from Tom.
Brady obviously paid McNally to deflate footballs during some time in the 8 month period and given the footballs in the Ravens game and Colts game were deflated, it's reasonable to presume that he had deflated those footballs as well. Particularly since the cameras show McNally sneaking off to the bathroom with the footballs in tow which breaks protocol and common sense.
Mortenson's reporting the erroneous numbers turned the whole case into a huge fireball, as those numbers would have been proof somebody tampered. The NFL let that false report sit out there for months with no correction. When they finally released the actual readings months later in the Wells report, they buried them in an appendix because instead of the leak of 2 full psi's off, the balls were more like .2 to .5; Mike Florio, Dan Wentzel, and the Washington Post were all over this in case you missed it.
The more you look into Deflategate, the more you'll find it was a big gigantic lie.
Complaining about Mortensen's erroneous report is a diversionary tactic by the the Patriots PR to garner favor. You find an error and you fully exploit that error even though that error has nothing to do with the case at hand. This gets supporters to point out that because the opponent is wrong in this instance, then you challenge their credibility on everything else.
In reality, Mortensen's report is a moot point. His report didn't influence the decision maker because the decision maker is the NFL themselves.
Again, the footballs had an average PSI of 11.33 when the projected PSI was supposed to be at 11.5 PSI (given *if* the footballs were at 12.5 PSI to start with). But, the average has nothing to do with the case at hand because if he cheated on 1 football...he cheated. And there were 4 footballs well below that projected 11.5 PSI
In fact, one of the footballs was measured at 10.5 PSI and perhaps Mortensen errored and thought they said the average was 2.0 PSI off.
Either way, Mortensen's report reflects badly on Mortensen...not on the investigation.
The issue with Goodell and Wells is that they did a haphazard job of investigating the matter. They never recorded the PSI of every ball prior to the game, they just had it determined that each ball was within the 12.5 to 13.5 PSI. Thus, a football could have been at 11.7 PSI at halftime, but if it started at 13.4 PSI prior to the game that is significantly below the projections based on the Ideal Gas Law and testing done by various scientists.
Furthermore, they should have recorded the PSI of each football and try to find an identifying marker for each football. That way they could show that Football #1 started at say...12.9 PSI prior to the game and then deflated to 11.1 PSI at halftime while football #2 started at 12.5 PSI before the game and came in at 10.7 PSI at halftime.
I certainly don't believe the assumption from Brady backers that each football started at precisely 12.5 PSI before the game and nor do I believe that McNally was incredibly precise with his deflating methods. He likely deflated them the best he could without making it too obvious. So he may have gotten a ball at 13.1 PSI, deflated it to 12.4 PSI and then took another ball at say 12.7 PSI and deflated that to 12.5 PSI and then took a ball at 13.4 PSI and deflated that more, all the way down to 11.7 PSI.
It's a tough call if you're just basing it on the football PSI's alone because the investigation was so haphazardly done, but when you combine them with the texts the only real conclusion is that Brady did have the footballs deflated. It's just that Goodell is so incompetent that he cannot even hire quality people to put forth a quality investigation to protect everybody, including the NFL, who is involved.
YR