This play could become one of the biggest ‘what-ifs’ of the 2023 season

[SteveTheCowboy]

You keep responding lol

The great irony

Because i respond that must mean i really care?

Im just having some fun and wasting some time.

Sorry to burst your big ego bubble kid.

Not everyone cares about what you think, especially as you run around bullying people....and saying stupid stuff like calling an opinion a "false narrative" as if you have no idea what either one means.

 

[Redline360]

First couple of series on both sides of the ball determined the outcome of the game. Bills gained momentum and never let go by running the ball at ease.

Should have got off the field with holding them to a FG then the penalty blocking the punt. Dak missed a wide open Cooks then next series(I think) we were driving down the field pretty good then Pollard had an 11yard run called back on a phantom holding call which replay showed nothing really. Next run play we got destroyed behind los and Dak took sack on 3rd down. Pretty much sucked the life out of the offense and defense got walked on rest of game

 

[Mac_MaloneV1]

Because i respond that must mean i really care?

Im just having some fun and wasting some time.

Sorry to burst your big ego bubble kid.

Not everyone cares about what you think, especially as you run around bullying people....and saying stupid stuff like calling an opinion a "false narrative" as if you have no idea what either one means.

Boo hoo

 

[starfan1]

You figure out English...what is it you don't understand?

Don't ever use English as an excuse.

The rest is your own short comings...stick to your isolated insulter's clubbies.

I don't kiss YOUR butt to discuss something, Mr. Hommie. Go back and reread or shut up!

Or just play in the street... At least learn to identify principals of game management which you understood not a single thing when applied by team management. None posted was stupid or ignorant.

I understand english just fine. Just not your version. You have a bad habit of writing a book or at the very least using your distorted language to make a point most of which dont always apply to the topic at hand. You dont need to discuss anything with me I didnt reach out to you in fact I wasnt even talking to you , So you go back and reread and shut it

BDC refers to me sticking my head in the sand and ignoring that dak is a problem my response to him (not you) was its a TEAM problem and those that take the ostridge approach to that are ignoring the complete issue. This last sunday was a complete team failure

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Boo hoo

Thats the spirit, kid!

 

[aikemirv]

I don't look at the offensive plays as the what ifs in this game. I look at the:

1 - Roughing the passer
2. Roughing the punter
3. Unchallenged fumble

3-3 versus 21-3

 

[Mac_MaloneV1]

Thats the spirit, kid!

Stop bullying me

 

[jazzcat22]

The way the bills ran the ball and how our defense played that play would have just stopped the bleeding temporarily before we bled out

Maybe not. Get a lead that possibly changes the Bills game plan some. And they would need to pass more.
And do you really think they as well, any Buffalo fan would trust Allen, not to be picked by Bland?

 

[HMJYay]

But, I'm told there was no WR seperation in this game. That Dak doesn't play defense and there is nothing he could have done? Like I said the offense scored 3 points in 57 minutes of this game. It's top 5 QB's job to take the team under his wing and keep them in the game. This throw could have done that. The mutiple missed throws against the 49ers in the playoffs would have. This is why you pay 40 million a year. It's why he gets all the credit when the defense get's 2 or 3 TO's and they win.

 

[Nova]

Don’t agree…the game is 7-7 and then Buffalo does exactly what the game plan was which is run the ball until Dallas stops us and they couldn’t. Maybe it’s not as much as a blow out but we weren’t winning that game, they were more physical, dominated TOP and the cowboys were sloppy in every way.

Martin leaving the game also still happens and I don’t think they over come that either.

Maybe!

The larger issue for me is that they just looked like the quit once they got down.

 

[CTcowboy203]

Maybe not. Get a lead that possibly changes the Bills game plan some. And they would need to pass more.
And do you really think they as well, any Buffalo fan would trust Allen, not to be picked by Bland?

Why would they need to pass more if they are averaging 4+ yards a carry running the ball?

 

[GMO415]

I'm too old to play the what if game. If my uncle gave birth, he'd be my aunt. Move on fellas.

 

[CCBoy]

I understand english just fine. Just not your version. You have a bad habit of writing a book or at the very least using your distorted language to make a point most of which dont always apply to the topic at hand. You dont need to discuss anything with me I didnt reach out to you in fact I wasnt even talking to you , So you go back and reread and shut it

BDC refers to me sticking my head in the sand and ignoring that dak is a problem my response to him (not you) was its a TEAM problem and those that take the ostridge approach to that are ignoring the complete issue. This last sunday was a complete team failure

Next lesson after following the need for English. Next picking up on direction of implied reference. Don't keep on going to a golf club bag with three clubs and an old putter. I know, that putter smooths out your ego and has your hands prints all over it. Now quote your sequenced lack of topics raised to you.

As to egos, there is no right way to do the wrong thing no matter how many times you want to ignore on topic stuff.

Don't care about reading books get your own Cliff Notes, but when wrong on topic or condescending one is in it already. I'll discuss my side. Some of your tripping elements are both wrong and condescending beyond talking.

Truth is truth...and on that alone is discussion on site. Don't respond, as if that is one of your responses. I am still and here directing towards what happens on the field.
___________________________

You explain and listen to some football, both...

Start at Parsons and the offense sticking with a full offense despite scores on the board...let's go, let's see some football stuff.

The Parson problem can be mitigated and against any team running the ball. Any...explain in a discussion.

If the Dallas offense, if fully using all of the tools, and score more than 10 points against any defense in the NFL.

A full offense wins more than homeruns with a Casey at the Bat approach. (you are unable to see a tendency to a touchdown pattern in football?)




It is still on the spot approaches that continue with the mission in sight. When a football team throws in wrinkles that are not really abstract, success against on the spot actions, still means adjusting within ones own scheme and applications under play, and meeting jobs assigned with meeting changes. There are already team, player, and scheme adjustments that will overcome specific momentum changes.

Too much is being abandoned by the Cowboys during mistake filled games. That makes an opponent 'tough.'

 

[CCBoy]

I'm too old to play the what if game. If my uncle gave birth, he'd be my aunt. Move on fellas.

A one year old can make Momma happy with coming up with her name. You got simple...next want some football and understanding beyond a beer and uttering, 'Damn?'

 

[Creeper]

I agree. That play was huge at the point in the game. Going three and out there gave the Bills momentum. But I would argue the holding call on Tyler Smith and the Roughing the kicker calls both made a huge difference in the game. Yes, they ran the ball down our throats in the 3rd quarter but they were ahead, our offense couldn't stay on the field or score, and the defense was getting tired.

 

[CCBoy]

Maybe not. Get a lead that possibly changes the Bills game plan some. And they would need to pass more.
And do you really think they as well, any Buffalo fan would trust Allen, not to be picked by Bland?

 

[jazzcat22]

Why would they need to pass more if they are averaging 4+ yards a carry running the ball?

I posted...if they were behind, they would need to pass more. Mixed with the runs., yes. But most teams pass more playing from behind.

 

[Proof]

Why? The game plan was clearly run on them until they prove we can’t. That wasn’t game script that was the blue print. The cowboys are missing Hankins run right at them and at parsons and the pass rush to negate what Dallas does best while also running clock.

Just my hunch. Yes they wanted to run, but it's much easier to do with a lead.

 

[CTcowboy203]

I posted...if they were behind, they would need to pass more. Mixed with the runs., yes. But most teams pass more playing from behind.

They wouldn’t be behind though…the game would be 7-7 based on the cooks over throw that the original post is based on. Buffalo got the ball and marched down the field on the opening drive. cooks had runs of 10&12 yards. Murray ran it in.

The only way they’d be behind if is if your also pretending the Lawrence penalty didn’t happen which makes this complete fantasy and I’d like to play- I make McCarthy take the ball and we score on a fictitious opening drive and have a lead to start the game

 

[jazzcat22]

They wouldn’t be behind though…the game would be 7-7 based on the cooks over throw that the original post is based on. Buffalo got the ball and marched down the field on the opening drive. cooks had runs of 10&12 yards. Murray ran it in.

The only way they’d be behind if is if your also pretending the Lawrence penalty didn’t happen which makes this complete fantasy and I’d like to play- I make McCarthy take the ball and we score on a fictitious opening drive and have a lead to start the game

You still don't get it. Even a tied game could make play calling a bit different. Hit that bomb for a TD. Even could effect the way the defense played.