49er game: Deer in the limelight.Trading away high draft value for a WR for lots of salary when Cooper was dispatched to Cleveland , poor guy , makes zero sense .
Lamb Washington Tolbert Brown probably Roberson UDFA over Fehoko also Vasher etc etc …the real concern is the offensive line upgraded enough to get the 140 million QB looking like he did against TB and the Patriots last yr and not the one on display against the 49ers .
Yes. We will never win a Super Bowl betting on the draft alone, anyway. And IF we are still tops in the NFC Least, then double yes if our next first is twenty-something. On the other hand, if we are no longer the best in the NFC, then we may be needing those next 2 picks, even if Daddy and Son are in charge.
so has GB they haven't done anything extraordinary in FA and the last few seasons been mostly defense. Not a bad plan to fist fix the other side which in turn will help our offense which is pretty solid IMO..no need to throw 2 firsts and 28mil dollar deal for a WR..not nowDallas has been addressing defense, last years draft was almost exclusively defense and this season more added, last years FA saw several defensive players brought in.
He would be perfect for Dak-friendly
A No. 1 in 2023 and again in 2024 for a sullen Deebo?
Or a No. 1 in 2023 and a No. 2 in 2024 for Deebo?
(I do believe the 49ers know they'd be picking 15 in 2023 and 2024 anyway and not some high number. So either scenario would be generous, lads. Very generous.)
Look, suburban folk, you can't get anything of value without giving up something of value, correct?
So, debt-ridden lads of the Metroplex and beyond, if you really, really want Deebo and Stephen finds the money to pay Deebo, tha is a plausible way.
It is a 2 way street, blokes.
N 3 could be pushing it. Especially considering his injury issues go back to college.Answer ..No. I love deebo but I'm not giving up premium picks for a guy that takes the beating he does at rb. His shelf life is about 3 more years at a high level. Now would I trade a 1 ? Yes. But not two.