To all the Romosapiens

rexrobinson

Active Member
Messages
1,039
Reaction score
0
bigbadroy;1110211 said:
rather have a rookie making those mistakes then a "14 year veteran" . plus we get to see what we got with romo.

I have to agree...when a 14 year Veteran throws 3 INTS AND doesn't throw a TD...yeah I think this is a better oppurtunity for the ball club in the long run
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,416
Reaction score
8,182
THEHEREAFTER;1110318 said:
What an *** idiot. I feel much better going down w/ Romo. IMO... the T.O. drop was huge. Sure Romo tried to do too much but it was refreshing to see a QB sidestep and move in the pocket a little. Somehow, I'm not as mad after this loss.


Glad to see you would rather lose with Romo than win with Bledsoe.

The TO drop was big but no bigger than the three INTs which led to 17 Giant points.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
CanadianCowboysFan;1110323 said:
We were still in the game at 12-7, Romo basically made a mistake every time he needed to make a good play..

We should have been up 14-12, but Bledsoe made another 35 year old rookie throw.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
CanadianCowboysFan;1110323 said:
We were still in the game at 12-7, Romo basically made a mistake every time he needed to make a good play..

We should have been up 14-12, but Bledsoe made another 35 year old rookie throw.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
CanadianCowboysFan;1110323 said:
We were still in the game at 12-7, Romo basically made a mistake every time he needed to make a good play.

Putting him cost us the game and most likely the season.

Please Romosapiens, had those throws been made by Bledsoe, there would have been 500 threads claiming he was the worst QB in the league, he should be benched etc.
14 year veteran

De facto rookie.

Same mistakes.

One will get better. Do the math.
 

SuspectCorner

Still waiting...
Messages
10,256
Reaction score
2,870
we already know drew can't get it done. romo threw two terrible picks tonight - but he's young and coachable. and more than that - he can create when nothing would be there for bledsoe.

Dear God - please let coach parcells stay with romo for the rest of the season.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
CanadianCowboysFan;1110323 said:
We were still in the game at 12-7, Romo basically made a mistake every time he needed to make a good play..

If Bledsoe could have scored more than 7 points in the first half, Romo wouldn't have been in there.
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
CanadianCowboysFan;1110323 said:
We were still in the game at 12-7, Romo basically made a mistake every time he needed to make a good play.

Putting him cost us the game and most likely the season.

Please Romosapiens, had those throws been made by Bledsoe, there would have been 500 threads claiming he was the worst QB in the league, he should be benched etc.


The difference is, brainchild, that Bledsoe is in HIS 14TH YEAR and STILL making those rookie mistakes. Romo played ONE HALF. Get a clue! Also take into account that it was DIRECTLY Bledslow's fault we weren't LEADING AT THE HALF!

Wow! Stupidity is a hell of a drug.

SS

:star:
 

Hoov

Senior Member
Messages
6,033
Reaction score
1,191
One more thing, football is supposed to be entertaining.

It sure did seem a lot more exciting with romo in there. With bledsoe at qb this year football has seemed so monotonous and predictable. At least ROMO provides some excitement. Sorry to those who disagree, but i just cant watch bledsoe anymore, its always seems to unfold the same...like bad deja vu
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
skinsscalper;1110233 said:
With Blessoe playing the way he was, the season was lost anyway. Might as well find out what we got. I'd rather lose with Romo than with Bledsoe. Atleast Romo will give a fighting chance. The human crash test dummy wasn't unbearable for any longer.

SS

:star:


3 interceptions in 2 quarters leading to 17 points is a "fighting chance"
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,416
Reaction score
8,182
skinsscalper;1110378 said:
The difference is, brainchild, that Bledsoe is in HIS 14TH YEAR and STILL making those rookie mistakes. Romo played ONE HALF. Get a clue! Also take into account that it was DIRECTLY Bledslow's fault we weren't LEADING AT THE HALF!

Wow! Stupidity is a hell of a drug.

SS

:star:

You Romopimps are certainly very defensive about your non-golden boy. Christ, you make the Hutchinson and Carter defenders look like amateurs.
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
chinch;1110255 said:
losing with Romo is an easier pill to swallow than losing with Drew.


losing isnt easy to swallow with anybody, that is dumb
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
BigDFan5;1110396 said:
3 interceptions in 2 quarters leading to 17 points is a "fighting chance"
They both will throw interceptions, but Romo is young and can learn. What can Bledsoe learn at this point?
 

Cowboy4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,189
Reaction score
4,494
CanadianCowboysFan;1110323 said:
We were still in the game at 12-7, Romo basically made a mistake every time he needed to make a good play.

Putting him cost us the game and most likely the season.

Please Romosapiens, had those throws been made by Bledsoe, there would have been 500 threads claiming he was the worst QB in the league, he should be benched etc.

Your right,, but here is the difference,, Romo CAN improve, Bledsoe CAN'T. The Kid made some mistakes tonight.. no doubt,, but Bledsoe was making the same mistakes,, after 14 years in this league. Is Romo the answer,, guess we will find out, but it won't be without mistakes.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
BigDFan5;1110396 said:
3 interceptions in 2 quarters leading to 17 points is a "fighting chance"

When the previous QB gives away points in the redzone and leads the team to 7 points in the previous two quarters, yes.
 
Top