Tom Coughlin annoyed over non-call on Romo-Hurd TD

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Stop whining Tom... you were clearly outcoached on that play... if you have to rely on a little move like that, your a bigger loser than I thought...

even if Patrick moved a little, it still doesn't take away from the fact that the call totally burned you, not the 'illegal' motion on Patrick...
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
The list of things that actually don't upset Tom Coughlin is relatively short. This is just another in a long line.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
I feel good about the Giants' prospects for this week if they're still talking about an illegal procedure no-call two days after the game.
 

Bach

Benched
Messages
7,645
Reaction score
0
shockey_shocked.gif


This never gets old
 

Danny White

Winter is Coming
Messages
12,497
Reaction score
391
I noticed Crayton jump on that play, and the ref on that side definitely saw it and made a twitch towards his flag but then didn't pull it.

My guess is that there are dozens of "borderline" plays every game like this where a ref sees a hold or contact or a twitch and has to make a judgement call if it is worth throwing the flag over. I'm glad he held off in this instance!

But yeah, live and in real-time, I thought we were definitely going to get flagged on that motion.
 

FCBarca

New Member
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
0
Coughlin has his point, there's no reason to consider it 'crying' when it was a pretty clear penalty...The Cowboys dodged one there and he's also right that with a 3rd and long it could've been a very different outcome from there.

Giants played well, they can't be faulted for that...Particularly, with several of their key players out...They had no problem moving the ball on us but true, with J-Load at the helm they faced a tougher prospect of marching down the field...Then again, you never know.

So was it a key play that was missed?...My own unbiased opinion is that it was a key play...And let's face it, the Cowboys dodged several bullets in the game and there's nothing to gloat over in the win...It was ugly, especially on D.
 

Crown Royal

Insulin Beware
Messages
14,229
Reaction score
6,383
FCBarca;1638038 said:
Coughlin has his point, there's no reason to consider it 'crying' when it was a pretty clear penalty...The Cowboys dodged one there and he's also right that with a 3rd and long it could've been a very different outcome from there.

Giants played well, they can't be faulted for that...Particularly, with several of their key players out...They had no problem moving the ball on us but true, with J-Load at the helm they faced a tougher prospect of marching down the field...Then again, you never know.

So was it a key play that was missed?...My own unbiased opinion is that it was a key play...And let's face it, the Cowboys dodged several bullets in the game and there's nothing to gloat over in the win...It was ugly, especially on D.


He should be upset - it was a clear violation of the rules verbatim. That being said, there is no indication that without that play to Hurd that the Giants would have held on to a win, or even prevented a first down. Our offense was on all cylinders.

And like I said earlier, it isn't as if that was the only missed call in the game.




I don't think the call was nearly as bad or damning to the giants as the phantom offensive pass interference on Todd Heap last night.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
FCBarca;1638038 said:
Coughlin has his point, there's no reason to consider it 'crying' when it was a pretty clear penalty...The Cowboys dodged one there and he's also right that with a 3rd and long it could've been a very different outcome from there.

Giants played well, they can't be faulted for that...Particularly, with several of their key players out...They had no problem moving the ball on us but true, with J-Load at the helm they faced a tougher prospect of marching down the field...Then again, you never know.

So was it a key play that was missed?...My own unbiased opinion is that it was a key play...And let's face it, the Cowboys dodged several bullets in the game and there's nothing to gloat over in the win...It was ugly, especially on D.


That still doesn't change the fact that the call by Jason Garrett totally had them surprised, so he has to rely on a little move by Patrick Crayton... Note to Tom:

Hurd burned your man, not Patrick...

The whining by Tom reveals the real issue... he was paying attention to the wrong receiver on that play...
 

cleverusername

New Member
Messages
803
Reaction score
0
superpunk;1638026 said:
The list of things that actually don't upset Tom Coughlin is relatively short. This is just another in a long line.


Coughlin is one of the most unlikable guys in the league. Even his players don't like him.

Parcells was strict but even he was funny at times.

If I made a list of the most hate-able people associated with the NFL, he would have to be in my top five. Has anyone even seen the guy smile? Man I feel sorry for his son in law.

2004-0922-coughlin.jpg
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,957
Reaction score
8,174
FCBarca;1638038 said:
Coughlin has his point, there's no reason to consider it 'crying' when it was a pretty clear penalty...The Cowboys dodged one there and he's also right that with a 3rd and long it could've been a very different outcome from there.

Giants played well, they can't be faulted for that...Particularly, with several of their key players out...They had no problem moving the ball on us but true, with J-Load at the helm they faced a tougher prospect of marching down the field...Then again, you never know.

So was it a key play that was missed?...My own unbiased opinion is that it was a key play...And let's face it, the Cowboys dodged several bullets in the game and there's nothing to gloat over in the win...It was ugly, especially on D.

You sound like a Giants fan.
 

FCBarca

New Member
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
0
SultanOfSix;1638055 said:
You sound like a Giants fan.


That kind of logic got this country into more trouble than any of us bargained for...Open mindedness is liberating, try it
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
FCBarca;1638038 said:
Coughlin has his point, there's no reason to consider it 'crying' when it was a pretty clear penalty...The Cowboys dodged one there and he's also right that with a 3rd and long it could've been a very different outcome from there.

Giants played well, they can't be faulted for that...Particularly, with several of their key players out...They had no problem moving the ball on us but true, with J-Load at the helm they faced a tougher prospect of marching down the field...Then again, you never know.

So was it a key play that was missed?...My own unbiased opinion is that it was a key play...And let's face it, the Cowboys dodged several bullets in the game and there's nothing to gloat over in the win...It was ugly, especially on D.
Was it a big play? Yes. Did we dodge a bullet? Yes.

But did the movement have any impact whatsoever on the play and the result of the play? Absolutely not.

So what's the point?
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I would have like the refs to call some holding that the Giants were getting away with as well but that did not happen. So complain all you want Tom
 

FCBarca

New Member
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
0
theogt;1638065 said:
Was it a big play? Yes. Did we dodge a bullet? Yes.

But did the movement have any impact whatsoever on the play and the result of the play? Absolutely not.

So what's the point?


Is that how they call penalties in the NFL now?...It doesn't impact the result of the play so don't bother calling it?...That is perhaps how it should be called but that's not how the game is called...It's the letter of the law/rules.

For example, the whole extra man on the field call...A guy running out of bounds before the ball is snapped...He isn't in the play and isn't impacting the outcome of the play but if his foot is still in bounds when that ball is snapped, that flag gets thrown.

It's just the way it is, a penalty is a penalty whether or not it would've changed the outcome.

I won't argue that it's a silly thing to call but it is what it is.
 

Da Hammer

The Natural
Messages
10,604
Reaction score
1
heavyg;1637952 said:
I agree. For the first time in a VERY LONG time I do not fear 3rd and long
yea and u know wat with this offense u expect them to convert on 3rd and long with Romo throwing to all our playmakers and thats without Glenn!!! Our offense has to be top 3 in most exciting offenses in the NFL!
 

Wolfpack

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,696
Reaction score
3,973
Tom should compair notes with Gibbs on how to send sour grape tapes to the league.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
FCBarca;1638071 said:
Is that how they call penalties in the NFL now?...It doesn't impact the result of the play so don't bother calling it?...That is perhaps how it should be called but that's not how the game is called...It's the letter of the law/rules.

For example, the whole extra man on the field call...A guy running out of bounds before the ball is snapped...He isn't in the play and isn't impacting the outcome of the play but if his foot is still in bounds when that ball is snapped, that flag gets thrown.

It's just the way it is, a penalty is a penalty whether or not it would've changed the outcome.

I won't argue that it's a silly thing to call but it is what it is.
No, it's not how they call penalties. But we're not deciding whether or not the penalty should have been called. Obviously it should have been. We're deciding whether or not anyone should give a damn whether it was called. Clearly it didn't impact the result of the play. It's a technicality that had no impact on the game other than the technicality existing itself (or in this case not existing). It's not like some holding penalty that sprung loose a long TD run.

It's also very unlikely that it would have impacted the result of the entire game had it actually been called.
 

Kilyin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,041
Reaction score
244
FCBarca;1638038 said:
Coughlin has his point, there's no reason to consider it 'crying' when it was a pretty clear penalty...The Cowboys dodged one there and he's also right that with a 3rd and long it could've been a very different outcome from there.

Giants played well, they can't be faulted for that...Particularly, with several of their key players out...They had no problem moving the ball on us but true, with J-Load at the helm they faced a tougher prospect of marching down the field...Then again, you never know.

So was it a key play that was missed?...My own unbiased opinion is that it was a key play...And let's face it, the Cowboys dodged several bullets in the game and there's nothing to gloat over in the win...It was ugly, especially on D.

Dodged several bullets? Like what?

And as far as the rest of your garbage, it ain't cheatin' unless you get caught. It's not the Cowboys fault the ref didn't throw the flag, and no amount of pissing and moaning by Coughlin is going to make a magical fairy named Mike Perreira float down from the heavens and give him a 'do-over'.

Point being, he should be a man, suck it up, and play better next time, so he won't have to cry about a flag that didn't get thrown.
 

FCBarca

New Member
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
0
theogt;1638080 said:
No, it's not how they call penalties. But we're not deciding whether or not the penalty should have been called. Obviously it should have been. We're deciding whether or not anyone should give a damn whether it was called. Clearly it didn't impact the result of the play. It's a technicality that had no impact on the game other than the technicality existing itself (or in this case not existing). It's not like some holding penalty that sprung loose a long TD run.

It's also very unlikely that it would have impacted the result of the entire game had it actually been called.

This is what you said, initially.

But did the movement have any impact whatsoever on the play and the result of the play? Absolutely not.

So what's the point?

My response was about whether the impact has any bearing on whether a penalty should be called or not...It doesn't, a penalty is a penalty...This kind of no impact penalty happens in just about every game.

And it being 'unlikely that it would have impacted the result of the entire game had it actually been called' is Cowboy bias, let's face it....It was 3rd down at a crucial juncture in the game as the gap was only a FG...Failure to convert in a 3rd and long and the ball goes back to NYG with plenty of time to tie or go ahead rather than being down 10 pts as the resulting no call turned out...So, intimating it is unlikely is a stretch...The sequence of events that could've followed would've completely changed...It was a pivotal noncall.
 
Top