SultanOfSix;1638240 said:
Not really. Calling yourself "objective" and "unbiased" when your post isn't.
All I see is excuses given for the Giants play and how we dodged a bullet. You mention how many injuries the Giants had, but what about all the injuries to the 'Boys?
You're talking about suppositions where Giants could have come back if the penalty was called.
What about suppositions where it didn't matter for the Cowboys if the penalty was still called. What if the 'Boys still called the same play and converted on 3rd and 12 instead of 3rd and 7?
Like I said. You sound like a Giants fan because you're giving every possible excuse for them while not allowing the same type of logic to be applied to the 'Boys.
If I'm a Cowboy fan and I confirm that a missed penalty call is a penalty call somehow that constitutes bias?...Ugghhh, yeah, sounds like great logic to me.
If the Cowboys got into 3rd and long, yeah, maybe they don't make that connection on the Hurd play...maybe they do...The point is, that penalty would've prevented the TD and given the Giant defense another shot at stopping Romo & Co...A scenario that AT LEAST was better than a TD that resulted...How is that supposition or anything but fact?...Come on, get with the program people...It is what it is.
I see things for what they are, regardless of who it benefits...I see a missed penalty and I think A) We got lucky that it wasn't called and B) Realize that NY were a bit hosed on that call...If it had been the reverse (Stay with me now), I'd still feel the same way about it...And I'm guessin the rest of you myopic 'fans' would as well...THAT, as they say demonstrates who maintains bias and who is actually seeing things for what they are.