jobberone
Kane Ala
- Messages
- 54,219
- Reaction score
- 19,659
Rack;2350916 said:1. Yes it is a broken pinky.
2. Yes, it is Anderson's fault (he blocked flozell knocking him off his man, the man who got to romo on the play where he broke his hand).
3. He ate a freakin' cricket. Yes, he is crazy.
4. Yes, some people here have already complared him to Moose. If that's not overrating him, then I don't know what is.
If you can't get the fact it's not a broken pinkie then there's no need to discuss the rest. Go back and read what his doctor said. I do understand your confusion as BSPN keeps reporting it as a broken pinkie and everyone else just assumes that's correct and keeps parroting it. However, there is plenty of information out there that is correct including many numerous posts in multiple threads on this forum.
He has a fractured 5th metacarpal. We are playing a contact sport here. His hand was broken by a guillotine strike from an opposing player's hand trying to dislodge the ball while it was being carried in a 'loose' fashion. Both the mechanism of injury and the fracture are consistent. It's no one's fault its broken unless you have an external agenda needing 'facts' to support it.
BTW, the external fixation devices or 'casts' he's been wearing are deliberately designed to not interfere with his 'pinkie'. There is no support for it and no protection for his pinkie because it's not broken. He could not throw the ball effectively with a splint on the little finger which is why they've had them custom built to avoid that area.