G2
Taco Engineer
- Messages
- 24,473
- Reaction score
- 26,213
Maybe you forgot that you posted Dak made Dez look horrible.Because streetwise keeps trolling me.
Maybe you forgot that you posted Dak made Dez look horrible.Because streetwise keeps trolling me.
Fans use stats or facts to support their narrative. Many of them feel Dak is being attacked and on the defensive.No they only consider stats. Unless of course you are talking about the last 8 games of the 2017 season. Then they will drum up all kinds of excuses
I think we might can agree Dak didn’t really make any of our recievers look as good as Romo did?Maybe you forgot that you posted Dak made Dez look horrible.
I am not a Dez hater. I didn't want him to leave but Dez wasn't all that great last year and his antics in that Seattle game was disgusting.He wasnt horrible Dak made him look bad
In all fairness Dak didn’t compliment Dez skills as much as Romo did.He wasnt horrible Dak made him look bad
I'm not talking about Romo. I'm specifically talking about how bad Dez played. More specifically in the Seattle game.I think we might can agree Dak didn’t really make any of our recievers look as good as Romo did?
Dez has some obvious flaws in his game but isn’t it a fair argument his skills weren’t as good of match for Dak as they were Romo?
No doubt Dez skills weren’t being utilized fully with Daks skill level. Instead Dez weaknesses rose more to the top. And considering Dez cost to payroll difficult to warrant.I am not a Dez hater. I didn't want him to leave but Dez wasn't all that great last year and his antics in that Seattle game was disgusting.
What I’m saying is it goes both ways.I'm not talking about Romo. I'm specifically talking about how bad Dez played. More specifically in the Seattle game.
It's not even debatable really.
That DOESN'T mean Dak is perfect! Or that it excuses any of Dak's mistakes. Simply put, Dez didn't do anyone any favors.
Could be, but I think he passed his physical prime. Maybe from too many injuries. Then I think the mental shortcomings kicked it. He wasn't able to shake off frustration.What I’m saying is it goes both ways.
Dez weaknesses in his game were more exposed with Daks skill level.
Dez was always over rated. Never ran good routes or had enough seperation. Couldn’t beat double teams like all the greats.Could be, but I think he passed his physical prime. Maybe from too many injuries. Then I think the mental shortcomings kicked it. He wasn't able to shake off frustration.
Romo did make WRs better, like Robinson. I don't know that is the case with Bryant.
I see your point about all our WRs doing worse, but I think it's exaggerated a bit.Dez was always over rated. Never ran good routes or had enough seperation.
He had a raw freakish talent level but was such an idiot almost uncoachable.. If not for Romo optimizing Dez skill sets hecwoukd have never been considered an elite WR.
The bigger concern is all of our recievers were not as effective or productive. That’s alarming evidence in itself. I understand there were contributing factors last year but there is a growing concern some of this could be on Dak.
Fair argument!I'm not talking about Romo. I'm specifically talking about how bad Dez played. More specifically in the Seattle game.
It's not even debatable really.
That DOESN'T mean Dak is perfect! Or that it excuses any of Dak's mistakes. Simply put, Dez didn't do anyone any favors.
https://www.___GET_REAL_URL___/s/insidethestar.com/tony-romo-documentary-in-the-works/amp/
I am excited! This could be amazing
To be fair, the Team has not gotten over the divisional round since 1996...
What does that have to do with Romo's own failures while here? The excuses this guy gets is really amazing to watch. While the current QB we have gets trashed every day.
Romo wasn't a winner. No one in that era was. Yet we revere them like they are something magical.
What does that have to do with Romo's own failures while here? The excuses this guy gets is really amazing to watch. While the current QB we have gets trashed every day.
Romo wasn't a winner. No one in that era was. Yet we revere them like they are something magical.
Well, if anyone really thinks he's something magical, I'd simply tell them that he was a good QB but merely a human one at that. I felt he did reasonably well considering the kind of support he got from the Dallas FO for most of his career. It's no piece of cake trying to make a poorly run team a winner.
If you think he wasn't a winner, how would you explain his winning seasons during his time with Dallas? The fact that his winning was pretty much limited to the regular season isn't that unusual for a team with limited talent. Unfortunately, this was a sad fact during his tenure, despite an abundance of those claiming the opposite in the minds of many highly devoted Cowboys fans.