Ok let's rewatch it. Check 36:07
Other than Dan Marino who didn't win a SB or Dan Fouts, most others won one. How does his numbers stack up against those two?
If rivers and Eli get in Romo should too because he was better than both.No, Rivers should not be in.
Feel free to find it and let me know where it is. But, I can assure you it was not a TD pass.Dude it’s cut off and doesn’t show the replay. I remember a play where the ball bounced off Fasano’s chest. There was another play in that game.
Also hasn't missed a single game in 12 seasons and counting.Do fans here think Phillip Rivers should be in the HOF? Similar situation as Romo - no Super Bowl, although a little more post season games and wins, but considerably more career yards and TDs. Romo has the higher career QB rating.
It might have been inside the 5 with no one around.Feel free to find it and let me know where it is. But, I can assure you it was not a TD pass.
I obviously wasn't totally serious. We know 2010-2013 were some of the worst defenses. That's why 2006-2007 hurt so bad. Romo had a great line pro bowlers all over the place. Hell we had like 4 hall of famers on those teams. Couldn't get it done. Either our gm and coaching is so bad or he just wasn't good enough.In 8 almost-full seasons, Romo had 10 losses where we scored 30 or more and another 4 where we scored 27 or more.....and Dak has 3 so far...which is 3 too many.
Not sure what Dak has to do with this conversation though. But I agree, he too has played well in a few losses.
This is another reason why Romo will never make it. He just wasn't dependable and he was always hurting. Even if he didn't miss games he held this team hostage with his frail body. Parcells used to tell him that too. It's nice not having to hear about your qb coming off offseason surgery every off season.Also hasn't missed a single game in 12 seasons and counting.
Yup, games missed from injury is on my list.This is another reason why Romo will never make it. He just wasn't dependable and he was always hurting. Even if he didn't miss games he held this team hostage with his frail body. Parcells used to tell him that too. It's nice not having to hear about your qb coming off offseason surgery every off season.
Jim Kelly and Dan Fouts are not “much better”. Not a chance.
Kelly played in 4 Super Bowls. Romo had how many playoff wins?
So is Jim Kelly better than, I don’t know... Drew Brees?Kelly played in 4 Super Bowls. Romo had how many playoff wins?
Both HOFers.So is Jim Kelly better than, I don’t know... Drew Brees?
We had 3 scorIng drives. 2 touchdowns and 1 FG. You just saw the incomplete pass to him on the FG drive. It did not occur on the 2 TD drives either. The other drives we didn’t get close to scoring a TD for him to drop a ball near the 5.It might have been inside the 5 with no one around.
No, Rivers should not be in.
It would be impossible to justify IMOI don’t necessarily disagree. My point in asking was I was curious if people think Rivers doesn’t belong but Romo does. I suspect some might, but to me if someone believes Rivers doesn’t belong it would be hard to justify thinking Romo does.
Other than Dan Marino who didn't win a SB or Dan Fouts, most others won one. How does his numbers stack up against those two?
Fouts and Romo were great passers... both of them finished in the Top 10 in passer rating a whopping 8 times. Fouts was not really any better (or worse) than Romo, but one has to admit he did revolutionize football. He was really the first high volume passer, the first guy to average 300 yards per game for a season. The whole Air Coryell thing was quite groundbreaking and he was a big part of it.Romo’s stats are comparable or better than Fouts, but the standards were much different 30+ years ago. QBs of that day didnt put up any better numbers than Fouts did, and when Fouts retired his career stats were among the best of all time.