Tony Romo is again the #1 Rated QB

[Michael88Irvin]

in the NFL per NFL.com

Carson Palmer dropped to 4th @ 96.9 (with his "performance" tonight)

Romo is #1 @ 98.4

 

[StevenOtero]

Hey NFL you have just been Romowned!

 

[theogt]

per NFL.com

?????

 

[Bleu Star]

Hey NFL you have just been Romowned!

Miami, We're on the way.

 

[Michael88Irvin]

?????

yes, it is called addition...

you take the stats from this NFL.com page: http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFL/PRAT/2006/regular

and add the game stats from this NFL.com page:
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20061218_CIN@IND

and there you have it.

 

[theogt]

yes, it is called addition...

you take the stats from this NFL.com page: http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFL/PRAT/2006/regular

and add the game stats from this NFL.com page:
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20061218_CIN@IND

and there you have it.

I didn't want to have to calculate it myself. I thought maybe it was mentioned somewhere. Sheesh, no need to be an arse.

By the way, I did calculate it and Palmer's rating is: 96.9.

 

[Da Hammer]

with Detroit still on the schedule and with us fighting for one of the byes i think its safe to say that Romo will finish #1

 

[Michael88Irvin]

I didn't want to have to calculate it myself. I thought maybe it was mentioned somewhere. Sheesh, no need to be an arse.

By the way, I did calculate it and Palmer's rating is: 96.9.

Not to be an arse, but it was calculated above.

 

[theogt]

with Detroit still on the schedule and with us fighting for one of the byes i think its safe to say that Romo will finish #1

That would be quite the feat.

 

[CF74]

I appreciate your math:laugh2:

 

[Bleu Star]

yes, it is called addition...

you take the stats from this NFL.com page: http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFL/PRAT/2006/regular

and add the game stats from this NFL.com page:
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20061218_CIN@IND

and there you have it.

 

[theogt]

Not to be an arse, but it was calculated above.

You edited the post. When I replied, all that was there was "per NFL.com" as evidenced by my quote of your post.

 

[Bleu Star]

You edited the post. When I replied, all that was there was "per NFL.com" as evidenced by my quote of your post.

How do we know you didn't only quote the "per NFL.com" part of it? Is there camera evidence of the rest having not been there? :

 

[dal0789]

You edited the post. When I replied, all that was there was "per NFL.com" as evidenced by my quote of your post.

Hes right^^^^

 

[JBS]

not to be an ARSE and ruin your post......but according to my calculations this performance gives manning a QB rating of 99. Which puts him at #1 and Romo at #2.

 

[Bleu Star]

Hes right^^^^

Where's the camera footage?

 

[Michael88Irvin]

You edited the post. When I replied, all that was there was "per NFL.com" as evidenced by my quote of your post.

Yes, but before the reponse to your ????, later 'arse' comment, and LONG before your 'new' math. (LOL) :laugh2:

 

[theogt]

not to be an ARSE and ruin your post......but according to my calculations this performance gives manning a QB rating of 99. Which puts him at #1 and Romo at #2.

I think you calculated wrong.

Let's compare:

Attempts: 442

Completions: 283

Yards: 3575

Touchdowns: 24

Interceptions: 11

Rating: 96.9

 

[Michael88Irvin]

not to be an ARSE and ruin your post......but according to my calculations this performance gives manning a QB rating of 99. Which puts him at #1 and Romo at #2.

LOL... good point.

 

[theogt]

Yes, but before the reponse to your ????, later 'arse' comment, and LONG before your 'new' math. (LOL) :laugh2:

I went and calculated it when I posted my "?????" post. Sorry, I don't re-read every post in a thread to see if it is edited before I post.