Hoods said:
That just means you heard it first. I'll go along though, but just out of curiousity, why do you not classify Tupac as a top lyricist?
I wasn't stating who heard him first. That's pointless and irrelevant.
I was stating that I heard him when he was new. Fresh. Entering the scene.
Not once he was shot and killed and all of the mystery and conspiracy that surrounds he and his death was created. I heard him as he grew in the industry. As he went from a no-name rapper to a popular artist. When he signed with Death Row Records. When he started acting, in "Juice" and "Poetic Justice". So on and so on.
I was able to compare him, when he was just a young, raw emcee from Oakland trying to make it, to other raw emcees from all over the country in a similar situation.
I don't mind his music. I think his music was good. But he didn't really do anything groundbreaking, IMO. His lyrics are okay but not "poetic", IMO. They are simple. His music was simple in concept and delivery and thus appeals to the masses. His lyrics are easy to follow and his subject matter was same old, same old. There's nothing wrong with that. Alot of good music is made in such a mold. But he never really broke any new ground or did anything that sperated him from a number of other emcees like himself.
In the world of Hip Hop, the real treasures are buried deep underneath the mainstream popular names and acts just like most genres of art. You have to be a true fan to discover the real talent that exists underground and is hidden behind what the masses accept as "talent". The masses like performers, not artists. The masses like simplicity not complexity. The masses like loud, catchy, repetition not innovations, subtly or depth.
JMO.