he’s not awesome, but he’s good enough if we fix other glaring / organizational issues.
Well, I distinctly recall two or three bad passes in the last two games and honestly, I don’t remember anything much before that but sure, why not. He left a ton of yards on the fieldHe did? So, a QB needs to throw for 6,000 yds to make you happy?
I think trading Dak (for any reasonable offer to be had) is moving backwards.
he’s not awesome, but he’s good enough if we fix other glaring / organizational issues.
No one is going to trade for Dak because he’s a free agent without the franchise tag. So either he plays for the Cowboys or he’s a free agent.But if you could land joe burrow would you do it? I would
what if you landed two first and was able to sign a phillip rivers type qb?
If Dallas could somehow land Burrows that would be fantastic. I highly doubt that will happen. But as a Cowboy fan I just hope that the Commanders who are picking 2nd dont somehow land Burrows. If they do its just a matter of time before Dak drops to the bottom in NFC east QBs.But if you could land joe burrow would you do it? I would
what if you landed two first and was able to sign a phillip rivers type qb?
Agreed, unfortunately everyone/team knows Dak is not worth two 1st round picks.Trading Dak IS crazy talk simply because it isn't going to happen. Zero chance.
It would take the entire draft to get Joe Burrow. So that won't happen either.
Didn’t the egirls just pay wentz. Do you think he is better than Dak.the patriots didn’t discover Tom Brady until they were moving backwards. The Colts didn’t acquire Peyton Manning until they were rock bottom. Kurt Warner didn’t sprout out of STL until they were at their lowest point.
You know what happens when you’re too afraid of moving backwards? You keep Andrew Dalton 4 years too long. You give Kirk Cousins a record setting deal. You bet the house on Joe Flacco.
And now youre about to give Dak an elite QB contract after winning 27 regular season games the last 3 years combined. Because it’s perceived to be the best you can do.
They're an 8-8 team. No time like the present to start looking.No deal baby!
QB like Dak comes once in a lifetime.
Who else can guarantee 3 and outs GALORE and falling behind in pretty much everyone one of our games?
Who else has that pinpoint accuracy that makes DB shiver back there?
Dak or bust baby I mean what was the Star before Dak????
What those 5 Superbowls Nah just luck man, not like Dak who has brought the glories of betaing monsters like the Giants and Skins!!!
Based on your hypothetical, I'd absolutely love to have Borrow over Dak, there's no question that he has better passing skills than Dak does.But if you could land joe burrow would you do it? I would
what if you landed two first and was able to sign a phillip rivers type qb?
I wonder what his td to int, completions and overall image were against winning teams last year...He did? So, a QB needs to throw for 6,000 yds to make you happy?
You can't trade a guy who doesn't have a contract, so it would take either signing him or tagging him. In either case, nobody would take Dak under either deal in exchange for the right to pick Burrow. Dak is a quality NFL QB, but Burrow is an elite prospect that will be on a rookie salary.But if you could land joe burrow would you do it? I would
what if you landed two first and was able to sign a phillip rivers type qb?
Why would the Bengals do that? The formula for winning in the NFL is quite clear. You need a QB on a rookie deal playing well above his pay grade which then frees up the cap space to load the roster with talent and depth at other positions.