Kevinicus
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,509
- Reaction score
- 12,264
Really. Care to explain? I think if anything, for you to take out a whole year worth of data for players who only played little over 2.5 years shows either you don't know how statistics work or your agenda.
If you take out the rookie year, you are only looking at 1.5 season of data. There is no way you can accurately evaluate a player based on 1.5 year of data.
This is same crap Romo haters used to do. Cherry pick data to fit their agenda.
You want to claim one thing that is false, then try and claim it's insignificant. That's not approaching it honestly.
I am not taking out a year. I am understanding the reality that that season deserves the least weight and trends with young players is more important. You want to see improvement. You want to see the ability to counter defensive adjustments. You don't want the good season to be the outlier (also important when analyzing stats).
You can analyze players beyond looking at stats (which will actually tell you more).