BS.
Romo started his starting career surrounded by very good talent in 2006. His 2nd year as a starter, he had 13 Pro Bowlers (a Cowboys franchise record) playing alongside him, so let's stop with the BS talk that Romo never had a good team around him, especially during his early years. That's just a flat out lie.
The guy simply went Hollywood as soon as he became the starter in 2006, and he went to Cabo during the 2007 playoffs (who in the heck does that???). Even Troy was upset about that and mentioned how that type of thinking will only hurt the team, which it did. By the time Romo truly took the game seriously years later, his body was breaking down due to injury after injury.
Learn to read buddy. I said post Parcells. Had Parcells stayed I’m sure we’d be not talking about how Romo couldn’t win the big one.
Also, “going Hollywood” doesn’t even mean anything. Was Romo acting? Did he give up going to practice, getting better because he was focusing on a movie career?
Romo had twenty five fourth quarter comeback victories. He was hardly a choker and was a leader on the field.
Leadership...chemistry...(or their lack thereof) are all just buzzwords that aren't given more import than they when victories or losses happen.
And going to Cabo had zero to do with the loss. That’s just talking head bull**** that was given as an impotent reason post facto.
You Romo haters are so annoying. Romo’s lack of success has nothing to do with Dak’s existence. At all. A SB victory is an ORGANIZATIONAL effort, not just a player effort. Plenty of average QBs, e.g., Trent Dilfer, Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, etc., have won SBs, and a number of great ones, e.g., Dan Marino, Dan Fouts, etc., haven't.