So changing defensive schemes. But staying with a 4 man front. Huh?
Will be shortly after your proof that it wasn't.
See how that works.
Leopards don't change their spots.
similar to the Saints D..Probably means less one-gap, with quick light DTs, and more two-gap principles, with heavy space-eating DTs.
Shut upExactly...
And as we all know, almost all 30 year old 1st year OC's dominate NFL DC's by the end of their 1st season.
Finishing #1 in yards and #6 in points is pathetic...
A good thing while Mike handles structure and staff, let the scouts do their job without coach interference.wow...NOW that's interesting.
Will be shortly after your proof that it wasn't.
See how that works.
Leopards don't change their spots.
Where else am I going to find golden nuggets dipped in chocolate?Then pull your head outta your butt!!! Lol
similar to the Saints D..
And that's exactly what you want right, a play caller with no input on the scheme? SMH.Moore calling the plays on game day doesn’t mean that MM hasn’t had input in designing plays during the week...
Everything feels positive since MM got here.
I see everything circles back to blaming Garrett. Whatever makes you feel better I guess.YOU MEAN GARRETT. I have read several articles saying HE, not Moore..was calling many of those plays down the stretch. When you think back,it adds up.
lmao..odd comment. The guy was here for 10 years man. HE IS GONE..HE FAILED THE TEAM AND THEY TUNED HIM OUT IN TURN. Yes, it does fall on him.I see everything circles back to blaming Garrett. Whatever makes you feel better I guess.
And that's exactly what you want right, a play caller with no input on the scheme? SMH.