Jstopper
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,488
- Reaction score
- 8,007
So you’re saying Wyatt Ray is in the way?
becuase they’re not about to sign anyone that can actually help
If they sign Von or Chandler come back here and apologize. I’ll accept it
So you’re saying Wyatt Ray is in the way?
becuase they’re not about to sign anyone that can actually help
A like for your Angus avatar.He's so ignorant he will buy a 100 lb . gold chain and then realize it's too heavy to wear .
Never made an assessment but your Karen is showing.
They just said on the NFL Network (Insider Mike Garafolo) what happened:
**********
Gregory agreed in principle with Denver. Then, Dallas asked him if they matched Denver’s contract, would he stay in Dallas.
Randy said yes and went to sign.
Dallas printed the contract. In the contract was a clause that is in every single contract Dallas does. It said that if the player gets suspended for testing positive for a substance, the guarantees are forfeited. All Dallas’ contracts (other than Dak’s) have that in them. NFL Network went and looked at a bunch of Dallas’ contracts and it was in every one except for Dak’s.
Gregory said he didn’t want that and left to go to Denver.
**********
The Dallas front office makes their mistakes but they didn’t do anything wrong here. Randy showed zero gratitude for all Dallas had done for him and decided to live in a state where weed is legalized (hinted at by the NFL Network).
People beating up the front office for this need to wait to find out what really happened before condemning the Cowboys. JMO.
It was a legit question on how they could've came to that conclusion. Especially for a guy who can't seem to stay on the field and isn't very reliable.Only know one Karen, and we served together. Now, back to your posts. The tweet was concerning who the Broncos felt was higher on their board, and you said and I quote, "Based on what?" That question gives the impression that you do not agree. It leads me to believe that you have your own astounding scouting report that differs. I may be wrong, but I never ask a question like that unless I have my own opinion; therefore, I gave my opinion.
I'm not frustrated, I'm glad he's not here, it's pure glee
Worry about yourself, not me.Gregory, does not owe the DFT anything. He apologized and thanked all those who helped him. Football is a business. Stop acting like this is some prodigal son rendition.
It was a legit question on how they could've came to that conclusion. Especially for a guy who can't seem to stay on the field and isn't very reliable.
Worry about yourself, not me.
They said on the NFL Network that very few teams would have stuck with Randy and provided the off field help like Dallas did. One guy said “none”.
Personally, I would have felt an obligation to the team if I were him. Not everyone’s moral compass points the same way though.
I couldn’t care less if I’m honest with you. I just want to winBut you're fine with the team negotiating in bad faith trying to "sneak in" contact language after a deal had been agreed to? Sounds about right for that type.
Lol, it's standard for all NFL teams. It is covered in the CBA if it isn't written in the contract itself. It was written in the previous Gregory contract that he signed. No matter what team he plays for, he will have it as all players do because it is in the CBA.
Lol, yes with the actual contracts shown. The exact same clause in the previous contract that he signed.I see you just listened to Fisher explain all this on youtube a few minutes ago.
Except, according to Fisher, it is in the contract.... regardless if it is written in the contract, because it is EXPRESSLY written into the terms of the CBA. So the CBA applies, no matter how the contract is written.He is basically getting one big payday at his age. If I was him, and I was always one dumb decision away from risking a big chunk of that payday then I’d go with team that didn’t want to protection from that.