Boysboy;2337789 said:
You mean he's NOT perfect??:laugh1:
Like I said-you want him out, that's fine with us. Our pass D suffers, don't come back here crying with thread after thread(like you guys did after Roy's absense showed its true colors).
Actually I think there have been about half, or even less, the amount of Roy threads since he went out injured so I don't know where you're getting this idea.
I, for one, actually like Roy and just wish he could cover better but I never really wanted him gone anyway but all these threads that you say have popped up wishing we still had him in certainly isn't accurate. There have been a few, inquiring about his return, but there have been FAR less Roy threads since he's been out then there are the ones blaming him when he's in.
Boysboy;2337795 said:
So just b/c he hasn't recorded an INT, that makes him bad?
Heh-guess we should have given Samuels a boat-load of money instead, eh?
Actually yes. At least with Samuels I know I'm not counting on some bonehead whose 1 miss step away from being gone again.
I don't think Jones has been horrible, like some think, but he certainly hasn't played very, very, very well like some here are trying to indicate either. He's not been the upgrade on Punt Returns over Crayton that so many thought he'd be (To this point anyway), and he hasn't been that great in coverage either. He got beat by Fitz and Breaston just as much as Henry did Sunday and he was part of that secondary that allowed TJ to have a nice game, that allowed the Commanders to have a good game (Though, yes, we all admit that Newman was more to fault there).
I've actually seen more timely pass defenses, and better plays, out of Jenkins more often thus far than Jones so I wouldn't cry, at all, if we relied more on Jenkins than Jones.