austintodallas
Consider Yourself Sucked
- Messages
- 2,413
- Reaction score
- 1
Some nice analysis here from one of Vela's sources regarding Wimbley vs. Lawson vs. Carpenter...
http://theboysblog.com/
http://theboysblog.com/
austintodallas said:Thanks for transcribing Duane...that site doesn't let me copy and paste.
Me to but I'd like him better in the 22-25 range.Rockytop6 said:I sure hope we get Carpenter.
Duane * of Bobby Carpenter said:I agree with that statment, from the highlight cuts I saw, he seems to have that quickness to the QB, that none of the other guys seem to have. Wimbley had some, but Manny Lawson, I have real concerns if he will be a good LB that can take on Blockers ala Ware did.
He won't be there. Pats will be all over him.big dog cowboy said:Me to but I'd like him better in the 22-25 range.
big dog cowboy said:Me to but I'd like him better in the 22-25 range.
aardvark said:Hawk is the top LB no doubt (top 5 pick), but if it weren't for Carpenter's leg injury he wouldn't be behind Hawk much at all
MichaelWinicki said:I'm becoming less enchanted with Lawson.
I've never been big on Wimbley. To me he's a "speed" guy with little else.
TruBlueCowboy said:I'm slowly starting to get won over by the Carpenter side myself. The more I read as draft day nears, the more I like him. Darnit, time to get a new sig.
Why? Sheer fickleness?Woods said:Ha ha, I think quite a few of us our now joining the Carpenter bandwagon and slowly getting off the Lawson bandwagon as our first choice at OLB.
I'm still trying to decide between Wimbley and Carpenter, though.
theogt said:Why? Sheer fickleness?
But since he's a great match for our system this can't be the answer.MichaelWinicki said:Maybe it's because he's not as good a match for our system...
theogt said:But since he's a great match for our system this can't be the answer.
Lawson is strong and can stand up against the run. He's got the speed to be great in coverage and is far and away the best pass-rusher. It's a clear choice at 18 between Carp and Lawson. The only question is whether its more valuable to trade down to get Carp. That may be more valuable, but saying Lawson isn't a good fit here doesn't make sense to me.MichaelWinicki said:You says he is?
I don't follow the point.
If we didn't have Ware you could make an argument for the guy. But we need a "Carl Banks" type and not another "LT" type. Carpenter is much more like Banks. A solid all around LB.