Vick's Defense Team Divided

CanadianCowboysFan;1589752 said:
One's definition of right might not be the same as another's.

And if YOUR definition of right includes abusing animals for fun and profit, then you have no honor, and should never again be allowed to comment on what is or isn't homorable...

ANYBODY who really does possess honor understands that abusing animals for fun and profit is WRONG... if you don't understand that, then you lack honor...
 
I'd love to see this go to trial and see other thugs' names comes out like... Clinton Portis, for example.
 
silverbear;1590264 said:
And if YOUR definition of right includes abusing animals for fun and profit, then you have no honor, and should never again be allowed to comment on what is or isn't homorable...

ANYBODY who really does possess honor understands that abusing animals for fun and profit is WRONG... if you don't understand that, then you lack honor...

not sure how you deduced I think it is ok to abuse animals, but hey, jump to any conclusion you want, no skin off my nose oh honourable one
 
CanadianCowboysFan;1590332 said:
not sure how you deduced I think it is ok to abuse animals, but hey, jump to any conclusion you want, no skin off my nose oh honourable one

Well, you seem to be far more concerned about the "rats" in this, than about the DOGS...

It ain't my fault if you're portraying yourself in a way that makes you uncomfortable... it's not my values that are out of whack...
 
Verdict;1589622 said:
If I were to hazard a guess about this case, my guess would be that the federal govenment's case is pretty sound. They don't usually even file a case unless they have a high probability of success.

Perhaps in the state system this can be stated as a fact. However, federal prosecution is a totally different ballgame.
 
el_chevo;1590463 said:
Perhaps in the state system this can be stated as a fact. However, federal prosecution is a totally different ballgame.

If anything, Federal cases lean even more towards this. Feds typically don't even file unless they believe they have a very good chance of conviction. At least, that's what I understand to be true.
 
ABQCOWBOY;1590561 said:
Feds typically don't even file unless they believe they have a very good chance of conviction. At least, that's what I to be true.
With a conviction rate of 95% or more, I knew Vick was in trouble the second they filed aginst him.
 
big dog cowboy;1590567 said:
With a conviction rate of 95% or more, I knew Vick was in trouble the second they filed aginst him.

Yep.....
 
and so is the original sheriff "investigating" the crime. It is being reported that Vick is negotiating a plea deal and it isn't because he is innocent. Story below.


Source: Jeremy Redmon, Bill Rankin, Atlanta Journal Constitution

Sources with knowledge of the case against Falcons QB Michael Vick say that Vick is likely to plead guilty sometime this week. Vick, who could be facing an additional indictment which includes racketeering charges, has not officially made his decision in part because he's not sure what effect it will have on his NFL career. Currently Vick is charged with a single count of conspiracy to cross state lines to engage in illegal gambling; sponsor a dog in an animal fighting venture; and buy, transport and receive dogs for animal fighting. The maximum penalty for the conspiracy charge is five years in prison.
If Vick pleads guilty, he likely would serve no more than a year in jail, according to federal guidelines. If the conspiracy charges are dropped, allowing him to only admit a role in the dogfighting offenses (misdemeanors) he could face even less time.

Vick's legal team not only must negotiate with the U.S. Attorney's Office, but with the NFL as well. If Vick cannot secure a deal that saves his NFL career, he could decide to go to trial, risking a lengthy prison sentence if he is convicted.
 
If he misses anything less then 2 football season with Jail time and suspenion this would be a joke.
 
CanadianCowboysFan;1590335 said:
Seven;1590229 said:
thee
QUOTE]


speaking of dumb


Read it in context. Emphasized Einstein. Do you walk on all fours or are you of the slithering type? I couldn't imagine you in the bi-pedial grouping.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,869
Messages
13,901,729
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top