Video: Bradie James & Roy Williams

[TEK2000]

Tek2000 made some specific points, so maybe you should address those.

He conveniently failed to respond to the stats I posted when they were posted 4 or 5 pages ago as well.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

No crap... who on earth said he was?

im not saying you did mang but this argument has gone full circle twice and everyone is saying the same thing.

i actually agree with you brah and i dont necessarily think that ABQ at the heart of the matter does either. I think hes just not going to get his hopes up no matter how much evidence we show him

 

[TEK2000]

im not saying you did mang but this argument has gone full circle twice and everyone is saying the same thing.

i actually agree with you brah and i dont necessarily think that ABQ at the heart of the matter does either. I think hes just not going to get his hopes up no matter how much evidence we show him

From what I've read over the last few pages between theogt and ABQ, I thought the argument was whether or not Roy was a liability in coverage. In which the stats show he is NOT yet ABQ continues to say he is.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

From what I've read over the last few pages between theogt and ABQ, I thought the argument was whether or not Roy was a liability in coverage. In which the stats show he is NOT yet ABQ continues to say he is.

and then abq will say hes a liability because we play the cover 2 to which we will say that phillips wont run a cover 2 to which he will say he will believe it when he sees it to which we will say that statistically he wasnt bad even in the cover 2 to which he will say hes a liability in coverage to which we will show him stats indicating thats not the case and on and on we go.

it all boils down to the cover 2 scheme.