5Countem5;2499125 said:
:laugh2: Proctor sucks but your penchant for complaining is way out there- AGAIN.
On Play 1 - Was Proctor responsible for all 3 of those guys that sacked Romo? If so, I think the Houck needs to change up responsibilities and get him some help. Where's the condemnation of the other linemen?
On Play - I count no less than 7 defenders within 3 yards of the hole. Are you saying the failure of that play was HIS responsibility? If he had not been pushed back would the play have been successful? Where's the condemnation of the other linemen?
Play 3 - He waited on the snap count- like he has been coached his whole career. Wow.....
When Wade says something, blogboy, you might want to remember that he has forgot more about football than you know.
The guy obviously isn't going to make it in the NFL, that said I agree *somewhat* with you. He had it rough early on, but once he started getting the help he needed he wasn't as bad as he has been and he was doing it against the Giants D line. Of course it helps that Fred Robbins was out.
In those three plays he wasn't the only one to act like a turnstile and he man wasn't the first to get to Romo when he got kneed in the back.
On the safety that everyone is trying to crucify him for, he tilts his stance outword torward Flozell who ALSO didn't move. As far as he could tell, the Giants were offsides and I'm sure he expected the whistle to be blown and Romo wouldn't have been hit or a MAJOR penalty would have been assessed beyond the expect offsides penalty. That said, obviously neither Flozell or Proctor heard the correct snap count since neither moved at the snap of the ball. My guess is one heard nothing and the other heard wrong and told the other the wrong count.
It doesn't matter. Wade was a moron for saying that. One thing was clear, the Cowboys *corrected* the issue because they protected MUCH better in the after the inital failings. (besides the safety which was a communications issue)
